PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MSFT vs. XCNS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MSFT vs. XCNS.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while XCNS.TO (iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio) is Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past 5 years, MSFT returned 11.09%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for XCNS.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MSFT vs. XCNS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSFT is traded in USD, while XCNS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XCNS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -14.48% return, which is significantly lower than XCNS.TO's 2.80% return.

MSFT

1D
-1.18%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
-14.48%
6M
-15.77%
1Y
-11.77%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
24.64%

XCNS.TO

1D
-1.59%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
2.80%
6M
4.31%
1Y
10.57%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. XCNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation		-14.48%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%17.36%
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio		2.80%15.74%3.01%13.36%-16.54%5.99%12.96%4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and XCNS.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2019

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Microsoft Corporation

iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio

Often compared with MSFT:
MSFT vs. AAPLMSFT vs. GOOGMSFT vs. AMZNMSFT vs. NVDAMSFT vs. SPYMSFT vs. METAMSFT vs. QQQ
Often compared with XCNS.TO:
XCNS.TO vs. XBAL.TOXCNS.TO vs. XINC.TOXCNS.TO vs. VCNS.TOXCNS.TO vs. XEQT.TOXCNS.TO vs. GCNS.TOXCNS.TO vs. XGRO.TOXCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO

Return for Risk

MSFT vs. XCNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO
XCNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. XCNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MSFTXCNS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.47
1.33

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.49
1.94

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.25

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

1.78

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

7.47

-8.20

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFT vs. XCNS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the XCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and XCNS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MSFTXCNS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

1.33

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.29

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.55

+0.19

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. XCNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than XCNS.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and XCNS.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MSFTXCNS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.38%

-23.81%

-45.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.91%

-5.97%

-27.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.91%

-8.74%

-25.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

-23.81%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.56%

-2.61%

-20.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.78%

-6.07%

-15.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.13%

1.42%

+14.71%

Volatility

MSFT vs. XCNS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) at 3.35%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MSFTXCNS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.25%

3.35%

+6.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.36%

6.61%

+15.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.31%

7.98%

+17.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.64%

9.58%

+17.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

10.35%

+16.71%

Dividends

MSFT vs. XCNS.TO - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than XCNS.TO's 2.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation		0.86%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio		2.51%2.54%2.58%2.49%2.26%1.81%2.15%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MSFT and XCNS.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT and XCNS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer