MSFT vs. VCLT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 24.64%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for VCLT. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MSFT vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -14.48% return, which is significantly lower than VCLT's 0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed VCLT with an annualized return of 24.64%, while VCLT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.14% annualized return.

MSFT

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: -14.48%
• 6M: -15.77%
• 1Y: -11.77%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 11.09%
• 10Y*: 24.64%

VCLT

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.62%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: -0.19%
• 1Y: 6.74%
• 3Y*: 4.19%
• 5Y*: -2.13%
• 10Y*: 2.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-14.48%	15.58%	12.93%	58.19%	-28.02%	52.48%	42.53%	57.56%	20.80%	40.73%
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF	0.19%	7.18%	-1.90%	11.17%	-25.50%	-1.73%	13.27%	23.89%	-7.04%	11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and VCLT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009	0.03

The correlation between MSFT and VCLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSFT vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 24
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

VCLT

VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 26
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFT	VCLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	0.86	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.49	1.26	-1.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.15	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	1.29	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	3.15	-3.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFT vs. VCLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the VCLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and VCLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFT	VCLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	0.86	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	-0.17	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.17	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.39	+0.35

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than VCLT's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and VCLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFT	VCLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-34.31%	-35.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.91%	-5.25%	-28.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.91%	-13.03%	-20.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.15%	-34.31%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.15%	-34.31%	-2.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.56%	-15.03%	-8.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.78%	-8.16%	-13.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.13%	2.14%	+13.99%

Volatility

MSFT vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) at 2.27%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFT	VCLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.25%	2.27%	+7.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.36%	5.80%	+16.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.31%	7.88%	+17.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.64%	12.77%	+13.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.06%	12.85%	+14.21%

Dividends

MSFT vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VCLT's 5.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.86%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF	5.59%	5.51%	5.19%	4.67%	4.44%	3.07%	3.16%	3.81%	4.55%	4.01%	4.33%	4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFT and VCLT in my portfolio?

MSFT and VCLT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFT or VCLT?

MSFT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to VCLT (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs VCLT's -34.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VCLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.