MSFT vs. URA
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 24.64%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for URA. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFT vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -14.48% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 7.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 24.64%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 15.57% annualized return.
MSFT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -14.48%
- 6M
- -15.77%
- 1Y
- -11.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.64%
URA
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -16.78%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 43.02%
- 3Y*
- 33.80%
- 5Y*
- 19.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
MSFT vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -14.48% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 7.47% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and URA is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
URA
MSFT vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFT | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.17 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 1.52 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 3.16 | -3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFT | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 0.85 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 0.41 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | -0.07 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -93.54% | +24.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.91% | -28.43% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.91% | -37.81% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | -37.90% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | -61.45% | +24.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.56% | -47.89% | +24.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -74.99% | +53.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.13% | 13.66% | +2.47% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.25%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 16.85%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 16.85% | -6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.36% | 39.19% | -16.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.31% | 51.23% | -25.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.64% | 43.83% | -17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 37.84% | -10.78% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than URA's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.54% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and URA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (16.85%) compared to MSFT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs URA's -93.54%.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer