MSFT vs. QBTS

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MSFT in Software - Infrastructure, QBTS in Computer Hardware. Over the past 3 years, MSFT returned 8.85%/yr vs 125.25%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MSFT vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -14.48% return, which is significantly lower than QBTS's -1.22% return.

MSFT

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: -14.48%
• 6M: -15.77%
• 1Y: -11.77%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 11.09%
• 10Y*: 24.64%

QBTS

• 1D: 8.30%
• 1M: 14.44%
• YTD: -1.22%
• 6M: -9.18%
• 1Y: 38.72%
• 3Y*: 125.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-14.48%	15.58%	12.93%	58.19%	-14.81%
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	-1.22%	211.31%	854.44%	-38.88%	-83.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and QBTS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022	0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap MSFT : $3.07T QBTS : $9.49B
EPS MSFT : $16.79 QBTS : -$1.08
PS Ratio MSFT : 9.65 QBTS : 704.19
PB Ratio MSFT : 7.40 QBTS : 8.44
Total Revenue (TTM) MSFT : $318.27B QBTS : $12.44M
Gross Profit (TTM) MSFT : $217.41B QBTS : $8.25M
EBITDA (TTM) MSFT : $200.96B QBTS : -$399.03M

Return for Risk

MSFT vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 24
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 57
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFT	QBTS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	0.36	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.49	1.39	-1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.15	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	0.55	-0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	0.96	-1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFT vs. QBTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the QBTS Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and QBTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFT	QBTS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	0.36	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.19	+0.55

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and QBTS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFT	QBTS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-96.67%	+27.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.91%	-71.01%	+37.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.91%	-79.17%	+45.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.56%	-42.32%	+18.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.78%	-65.80%	+44.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.13%	40.50%	-24.37%

Volatility

MSFT vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.25%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.76%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFT	QBTS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.25%	42.76%	-32.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.36%	76.88%	-54.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.31%	108.49%	-83.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.64%	151.19%	-124.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.06%	151.19%	-124.13%

Dividends

MSFT vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.86%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFT and QBTS in my portfolio?

MSFT and QBTS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFT or QBTS?

QBTS has higher volatility (42.76%) compared to MSFT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs QBTS's -96.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.