MSFT vs. LAES

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MSFT in Software - Infrastructure, LAES in Semiconductors. Over the past 3 years, MSFT returned 8.85%/yr vs -31.28%/yr for LAES. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MSFT vs. LAES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MSFT having a -14.48% return and LAES slightly lower at -14.81%.

MSFT

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: -14.48%
• 6M: -15.77%
• 1Y: -11.77%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 11.09%
• 10Y*: 24.64%

LAES

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 10.27%
• YTD: -14.81%
• 6M: -34.42%
• 1Y: -6.94%
• 3Y*: -31.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-14.48%	15.58%	12.93%	19.77%
LAES SEALSQ Corp	-14.81%	-38.54%	380.47%	-92.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and LAES is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023	0.17

Fundamentals

EPS MSFT : $16.79 LAES : -$0.43
PS Ratio MSFT : 9.65 LAES : 10.60
Total Revenue (TTM) MSFT : $318.27B LAES : $35.37M
Gross Profit (TTM) MSFT : $217.41B LAES : $13.21M
EBITDA (TTM) MSFT : $200.96B LAES : -$41.81M

Return for Risk

MSFT vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 24
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

LAES

LAES Risk / Return Rank: 43
LAES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LAES Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LAES Omega Ratio Rank: 47
LAES Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
LAES Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFT	LAES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	-0.06	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.49	0.78	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.08	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	-0.10	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	-0.16	-0.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFT vs. LAES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the LAES Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and LAES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFT	LAES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	-0.06	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	-0.28	+1.02

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and LAES.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFT	LAES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-98.44%	+29.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.91%	-72.68%	+38.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.91%	-98.07%	+64.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.56%	-85.34%	+61.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.78%	-84.70%	+62.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.13%	42.96%	-26.83%

Volatility

MSFT vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.25%, while SEALSQ Corp (LAES) has a volatility of 28.36%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFT	LAES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.25%	28.36%	-18.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.36%	66.00%	-43.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.31%	110.53%	-85.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.64%	170.27%	-143.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.06%	170.27%	-143.21%

Dividends

MSFT vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while LAES has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAES SEALSQ Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.86%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFT and LAES in my portfolio?

MSFT and LAES have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFT or LAES?

LAES has higher volatility (28.36%) compared to MSFT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs LAES's -98.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.