MSFT vs. IBIT
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Over the past year, MSFT returned -11.77% vs -39.44% for IBIT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFT vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -14.48% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.71% return.
MSFT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -14.48%
- 6M
- -15.77%
- 1Y
- -11.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.64%
IBIT
- 1D
- 5.13%
- 1M
- -21.03%
- YTD
- -27.71%
- 6M
- -30.34%
- 1Y
- -39.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -14.48% | 15.58% | 10.94% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.71% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and IBIT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
IBIT
MSFT vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFT | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.86 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | -0.76 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | -1.36 | +0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFT | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | -0.90 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.26 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -52.11% | -17.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.91% | -52.11% | +18.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.56% | -49.66% | +26.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -16.19% | -5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.13% | 28.97% | -12.84% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.25%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 11.85% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.36% | 34.60% | -12.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.31% | 44.28% | -18.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.64% | 50.32% | -23.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 50.32% | -23.26% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and IBIT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to MSFT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer