MSFT vs. AVGX
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while AVGX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. Over the past year, MSFT returned -11.77% vs 84.42% for AVGX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFT vs. AVGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -14.48% return, which is significantly lower than AVGX's 12.39% return.
MSFT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -14.48%
- 6M
- -15.77%
- 1Y
- -11.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.64%
AVGX
- 1D
- 5.40%
- 1M
- -19.30%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- -18.84%
- 1Y
- 84.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT vs. AVGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -14.48% | 15.58% | -0.42% |
AVGX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF | 12.39% | 46.98% | 54.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and AVGX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. AVGX — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
AVGX
MSFT vs. AVGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFT | AVGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.22 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 1.57 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 3.47 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFT | AVGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 0.94 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. AVGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, roughly equal to the maximum AVGX drawdown of -70.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and AVGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | AVGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -70.97% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.91% | -54.09% | +20.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.56% | -34.40% | +10.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -22.78% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.13% | 24.40% | -8.27% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. AVGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.25%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) has a volatility of 41.90%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | AVGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 41.90% | -31.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.36% | 70.91% | -48.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.31% | 90.72% | -65.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.64% | 106.87% | -80.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 106.87% | -79.81% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. AVGX - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than AVGX's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF | 1.47% | 1.65% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and AVGX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGX has higher volatility (41.90%) compared to MSFT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs AVGX's -70.97%.
AVGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and AVGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer