MSFT vs. AGNC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) and AGNC (AGNC Investment Corp.) are both stocks. MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while AGNC operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 24.64%/yr vs 6.25%/yr for AGNC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MSFT vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -14.48% return, which is significantly lower than AGNC's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed AGNC with an annualized return of 24.64%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.25% annualized return.

MSFT

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: -14.48%
• 6M: -15.77%
• 1Y: -11.77%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 11.09%
• 10Y*: 24.64%

AGNC

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -5.84%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: 3.01%
• 1Y: 27.55%
• 3Y*: 17.15%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: 6.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-14.48%	15.58%	12.93%	58.19%	-28.02%	52.48%	42.53%	57.56%	20.80%	40.73%
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp.	-0.32%	34.92%	8.90%	10.14%	-21.65%	5.20%	-1.78%	13.31%	-2.46%	23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and AGNC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008	0.26

The correlation between MSFT and AGNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MSFT : $3.07T AGNC : $11.35B
EPS MSFT : $16.79 AGNC : $1.33
PE Ratio MSFT : 24.52 AGNC : 7.60
PEG Ratio MSFT : 1.72 AGNC : 0.02
PS Ratio MSFT : 9.65 AGNC : 4.66
PB Ratio MSFT : 7.40 AGNC : 1.11
Total Revenue (TTM) MSFT : $318.27B AGNC : $2.33B
Gross Profit (TTM) MSFT : $217.41B AGNC : $2.30B
EBITDA (TTM) MSFT : $200.96B AGNC : $3.72B

Return for Risk

MSFT vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 24
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

AGNC

AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 75
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 74
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFT	AGNC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	1.43	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.49	2.02	-2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.25	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	1.48	-1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	4.39	-5.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFT vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFT	AGNC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	1.43	-1.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.06	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.25	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.42	+0.32

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and AGNC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFT	AGNC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-54.56%	-14.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.91%	-18.71%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.91%	-31.04%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.15%	-54.36%	+17.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.15%	-54.56%	+17.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.56%	-12.19%	-11.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.78%	-13.56%	-8.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.13%	6.30%	+9.83%

Volatility

MSFT vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) at 4.92%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFT	AGNC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.25%	4.92%	+5.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.36%	15.96%	+6.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.31%	19.38%	+5.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.64%	25.82%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.06%	25.39%	+1.67%

Dividends

MSFT vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than AGNC's 14.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp.	14.24%	13.43%	15.64%	14.68%	13.91%	9.57%	10.00%	11.31%	12.31%	10.70%	12.69%	14.30%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.86%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFT and AGNC in my portfolio?

MSFT and AGNC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFT or AGNC?

MSFT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to AGNC (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.