MS vs. UBS
MS (Morgan Stanley) and UBS (UBS Group AG) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — MS in Capital Markets, UBS in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, MS returned 27.13%/yr vs 15.82%/yr for UBS. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MS vs. UBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than UBS's 3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed UBS with an annualized return of 27.13%, while UBS has yielded a comparatively lower 15.82% annualized return.
MS
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 21.34%
- 1Y
- 64.89%
- 3Y*
- 39.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 27.13%
UBS
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 16.80%
- 1Y
- 42.47%
- 3Y*
- 37.29%
- 5Y*
- 26.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
MS vs. UBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS Morgan Stanley | 20.86% | 45.16% | 39.73% | 13.93% | -10.34% | 46.65% | 38.09% | 32.67% | -22.76% | 26.61% |
UBS UBS Group AG | 3.43% | 60.21% | 2.03% | 67.65% | 5.92% | 27.93% | 17.99% | 7.15% | -32.68% | 21.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MS and UBS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2014 | 0.62 |
The correlation between MS and UBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MS:
$338.10B
UBS:
$191.26B
MS:
$11.41
UBS:
$2.24
MS:
18.59
UBS:
21.14
MS:
1.75
UBS:
0.38
MS:
2.81
UBS:
2.58
MS:
3.23
UBS:
2.06
MS:
$120.22B
UBS:
$64.08B
MS:
$69.72B
UBS:
$42.48B
MS:
$27.21B
UBS:
$11.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MS vs. UBS — Risk / Return Rank
MS
UBS
MS vs. UBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and UBS Group AG (UBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MS | UBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 1.64 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 4.36 | +7.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MS | UBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 1.65 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.89 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.52 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.39 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
MS vs. UBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than UBS's maximum drawdown of -61.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and UBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MS | UBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -61.38% | -26.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.83% | -26.07% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.24% | -27.00% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.38% | -33.41% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -61.38% | +10.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -2.74% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.70% | -19.25% | -14.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 9.81% | -4.13% |
Volatility
MS vs. UBS - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to UBS Group AG (UBS) at 7.09%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MS | UBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 7.09% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.21% | 20.67% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.62% | 25.85% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 30.31% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.51% | 30.38% | +1.13% |
Dividends
MS vs. UBS - Dividend Comparison
MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than UBS's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS Morgan Stanley | 1.88% | 2.17% | 2.82% | 3.49% | 3.47% | 2.14% | 2.04% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.73% |
UBS UBS Group AG | 1.16% | 2.92% | 3.46% | 0.89% | 1.34% | 1.04% | 3.87% | 5.48% | 0.00% | 3.30% | 5.42% | 3.87% |
Financials
MS vs. UBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley and UBS Group AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MS vs. UBS - Profitability Comparison
MS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.
UBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported a gross profit of 14.51B and revenue of 20.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.8%.
MS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.
UBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported an operating income of 3.77B and revenue of 20.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
MS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
UBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported a net income of 2.98B and revenue of 20.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MS and UBS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MS has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to UBS (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MS dropped -88.12% vs UBS's -61.38%.
MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MS and UBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer