PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRVL vs. AEVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRVL vs. AEVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 240.32% return, which is significantly higher than AEVA's 73.87% return.


MRVL

1D
9.63%
1M
69.78%
YTD
240.32%
6M
214.35%
1Y
323.75%
3Y*
69.41%
5Y*
42.37%
10Y*
41.26%

AEVA

1D
0.35%
1M
70.15%
YTD
73.87%
6M
53.02%
1Y
10.48%
3Y*
49.22%
5Y*
-16.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRVL vs. AEVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
240.32%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%114.11%
AEVA
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
73.87%179.58%25.38%-44.29%-82.01%-48.01%51.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MRVL and AEVA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020

0.36

The correlation between MRVL and AEVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MRVL:

$258.03B

AEVA:

$1.45B

EPS

MRVL:

$2.90

AEVA:

-$2.52

PS Ratio

MRVL:

28.91

AEVA:

63.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRVL:

$8.72B

AEVA:

$20.97M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.41B

AEVA:

$971.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.27B

AEVA:

$21.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRVL vs. AEVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AEVA
AEVA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRVL vs. AEVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRVLAEVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.12

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.37

0.14

+12.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.64

0.19

+28.46

MRVL vs. AEVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRVL Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is higher than the AEVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRVL and AEVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRVLAEVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70

0.09

+4.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

-0.17

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

-0.12

+0.36

Drawdowns

MRVL vs. AEVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, smaller than the maximum AEVA drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and AEVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRVLAEVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.60%

-97.71%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.36%

-75.68%

+49.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.79%

-75.68%

+14.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.88%

-96.02%

+34.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.72%

-76.91%

+68.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.77%

-70.68%

+23.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.37%

55.91%

-44.54%

Volatility

MRVL vs. AEVA - Volatility Comparison

Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) have volatilities of 38.50% and 39.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRVLAEVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.50%

39.11%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.32%

78.74%

-24.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.56%

114.82%

-45.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.51%

97.00%

-35.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.77%

91.35%

-39.58%

Dividends

MRVL vs. AEVA - Dividend Comparison

MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while AEVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEVA
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.08%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

MRVL vs. AEVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology, Inc. and Aeva Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.42B
6.26M
(MRVL) Total Revenue
(AEVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MRVL and AEVA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEVA has higher volatility (39.11%) compared to MRVL (38.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs AEVA's -97.71%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRVL and AEVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer