PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRO.L vs. LDO.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRO.L vs. LDO.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Melrose Industries plc (MRO.L) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MRO.L is traded in GBp, while LDO.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LDO.MI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRO.L achieves a -21.16% return, which is significantly lower than LDO.MI's 3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MRO.L has underperformed LDO.MI with an annualized return of 10.86%, while LDO.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 20.31% annualized return.


MRO.L

1D
-1.67%
1M
-10.13%
YTD
-21.16%
6M
-20.10%
1Y
-0.43%
3Y*
-3.20%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
10.86%

LDO.MI

1D
0.84%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
3.40%
6M
7.55%
1Y
1.16%
3Y*
72.31%
5Y*
49.98%
10Y*
20.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRO.L vs. LDO.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRO.L
Melrose Industries plc
-21.16%7.50%-1.49%102.51%-15.46%-19.88%-25.38%48.20%-22.05%8.06%
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
3.40%101.68%68.15%83.89%36.92%-0.92%-38.92%30.85%-20.28%-21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MRO.L and LDO.MI is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRO.L vs. LDO.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRO.L
MRO.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MRO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MRO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LDO.MI
LDO.MI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRO.L vs. LDO.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Melrose Industries plc (MRO.L) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRO.LLDO.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.04

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

0.01

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

0.01

-0.04

MRO.L vs. LDO.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRO.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRO.L and LDO.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRO.LLDO.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

0.00

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

1.40

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.54

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.20

+0.32

Drawdowns

MRO.L vs. LDO.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRO.L drawdown since its inception was -70.66%, smaller than the maximum LDO.MI drawdown of -84.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRO.L and LDO.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRO.LLDO.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.66%

-84.72%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.02%

-22.93%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.82%

-22.93%

-19.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.87%

-32.18%

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.66%

-72.53%

+1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.96%

-20.05%

-11.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.52%

-38.69%

+19.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.93%

10.72%

+3.21%

Volatility

MRO.L vs. LDO.MI - Volatility Comparison

Melrose Industries plc (MRO.L) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) have volatilities of 10.26% and 10.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRO.LLDO.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.26%

10.46%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.19%

29.48%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.14%

41.02%

-6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.76%

35.45%

+4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.26%

37.15%

+8.11%

Dividends

MRO.L vs. LDO.MI - Dividend Comparison

MRO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than LDO.MI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
1.01%1.06%1.08%0.94%1.74%0.00%2.37%1.34%1.82%1.41%0.00%0.00%
MRO.L
Melrose Industries plc
1.57%1.09%0.99%0.53%0.45%0.34%0.27%0.93%1.25%0.73%0.95%6.95%

Financials

MRO.L vs. LDO.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Melrose Industries plc and Leonardo S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MRO.L values in GBp, LDO.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


MRO.L and LDO.MI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRO.L and LDO.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer