MRK vs. ROL
MRK (Merck & Co., Inc.) and ROL (Rollins, Inc.) are both stocks. MRK operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while ROL operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, MRK returned 11.61%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for ROL. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRK vs. ROL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRK achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly higher than ROL's -21.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MRK has underperformed ROL with an annualized return of 11.61%, while ROL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.
MRK
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 14.39%
- 6M
- 22.75%
- 1Y
- 56.85%
- 3Y*
- 5.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
ROL
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -13.17%
- YTD
- -21.89%
- 6M
- -22.56%
- 1Y
- -18.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
MRK vs. ROL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 14.39% | 9.79% | -6.26% | 1.01% | 49.42% | 1.75% | -7.20% | 22.27% | 39.95% | -1.49% |
ROL Rollins, Inc. | -21.89% | 31.06% | 7.56% | 21.19% | 8.10% | -11.43% | 78.47% | -6.95% | 17.61% | 39.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRK and ROL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
MRK:
$295.45B
ROL:
$22.42B
MRK:
$3.58
ROL:
$1.10
MRK:
33.34
ROL:
42.54
MRK:
0.03
ROL:
3.85
MRK:
4.54
ROL:
5.86
MRK:
6.44
ROL:
16.23
MRK:
$65.59B
ROL:
$3.84B
MRK:
$49.79B
ROL:
$1.53B
MRK:
$22.69B
ROL:
$859.94M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRK vs. ROL — Risk / Return Rank
MRK
ROL
MRK vs. ROL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRK | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.87 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | -0.60 | +5.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | -1.85 | +14.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRK | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | -0.77 | +2.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.35 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.61 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.50 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
MRK vs. ROL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRK drawdown since its inception was -68.61%, which is greater than ROL's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRK and ROL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRK | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.61% | -57.27% | -11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -30.90% | +19.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.44% | -30.90% | -12.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.44% | -30.90% | -12.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.44% | -30.90% | -12.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -28.54% | +23.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -12.13% | -6.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 9.97% | -5.44% |
Volatility
MRK vs. ROL - Volatility Comparison
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Rollins, Inc. (ROL) at 8.75%. This indicates that MRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRK | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 8.75% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.14% | 19.11% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.30% | 24.09% | +3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 24.57% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 25.04% | -2.08% |
Dividends
MRK vs. ROL - Dividend Comparison
MRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than ROL's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 2.78% | 3.12% | 3.14% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 3.41% | 3.03% | 2.48% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.43% |
ROL Rollins, Inc. | 1.53% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.18% | 1.23% | 0.84% | 1.42% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.18% | 1.62% |
Financials
MRK vs. ROL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Merck & Co., Inc. and Rollins, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRK vs. ROL - Profitability Comparison
MRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.34B and revenue of 16.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
ROL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 906.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported an operating income of -1.88B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in an operating margin of -11.6%.
ROL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.49M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
MRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a net income of -4.24B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in a net margin of -26.0%.
ROL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 107.84M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRK and ROL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRK has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to ROL (8.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRK dropped -68.61% vs ROL's -57.27%.
MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRK and ROL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer