MPWR vs. QRVO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) and QRVO (Qorvo, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, MPWR returned 37.72%/yr vs 6.34%/yr for QRVO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

MPWR vs. QRVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 72.37% return, which is significantly higher than QRVO's 18.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MPWR has outperformed QRVO with an annualized return of 37.72%, while QRVO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.34% annualized return.

MPWR

• 1D: 5.28%
• 1M: -2.60%
• YTD: 72.37%
• 6M: 59.11%
• 1Y: 128.65%
• 3Y*: 47.03%
• 5Y*: 36.56%
• 10Y*: 37.72%

QRVO

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: 10.34%
• YTD: 18.20%
• 6M: 11.73%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 0.52%
• 5Y*: -11.26%
• 10Y*: 6.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPWR vs. QRVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.	72.37%	54.45%	-5.55%	79.78%	-27.78%	35.49%	107.49%	54.80%	4.49%	38.23%
QRVO Qorvo, Inc.	18.20%	20.85%	-37.90%	24.24%	-42.04%	-5.94%	43.05%	91.39%	-8.81%	26.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MPWR and QRVO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.66

The correlation between MPWR and QRVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MPWR : $76.78B QRVO : $9.25B
EPS MPWR : $13.89 QRVO : $3.63
PE Ratio MPWR : 112.24 QRVO : 27.55
PEG Ratio MPWR : 1.41 QRVO : 0.25
PS Ratio MPWR : 25.63 QRVO : 2.54
PB Ratio MPWR : 20.88 QRVO : 2.77
Total Revenue (TTM) MPWR : $2.96B QRVO : $3.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) MPWR : $1.63B QRVO : $1.69B
EBITDA (TTM) MPWR : $861.78M QRVO : $659.34M

Return for Risk

MPWR vs. QRVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPWR

MPWR Risk / Return Rank: 92
MPWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
MPWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MPWR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MPWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MPWR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QRVO

QRVO Risk / Return Rank: 64
QRVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
QRVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QRVO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QRVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
QRVO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPWR vs. QRVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MPWR	QRVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	0.79	+1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	1.24	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.17	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.76	1.24	+4.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.40	2.44	+12.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MPWR vs. QRVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPWR Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the QRVO Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPWR and QRVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MPWR	QRVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	0.79	+1.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	-0.27	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.15	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.07	+0.51

Drawdowns

MPWR vs. QRVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, roughly equal to the maximum QRVO drawdown of -74.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and QRVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPWR	QRVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.27%	-74.54%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.45%	-21.97%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.65%	-60.68%	+9.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.65%	-74.03%	+22.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.65%	-74.54%	+22.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.73%	-49.94%	+42.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.72%	-31.88%	+14.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.38%	11.14%	-2.76%

Volatility

MPWR vs. QRVO - Volatility Comparison

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a higher volatility of 19.38% compared to Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) at 15.19%. This indicates that MPWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPWR	QRVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.38%	15.19%	+4.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.53%	26.14%	+10.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.99%	34.65%	+13.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.40%	42.15%	+11.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.17%	42.05%	+5.12%

Dividends

MPWR vs. QRVO - Dividend Comparison

MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while QRVO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.	0.43%	0.69%	0.85%	0.63%	0.85%	0.49%	0.55%	0.90%	1.03%	0.71%	0.98%	1.26%
QRVO Qorvo, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

MPWR vs. QRVO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Qorvo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MPWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

QRVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 395.02M and revenue of 808.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.

MPWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.

QRVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.51M and revenue of 808.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

MPWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.

QRVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a net income of 29.73M and revenue of 808.28M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPWR and QRVO in my portfolio?

MPWR and QRVO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MPWR or QRVO?

MPWR has higher volatility (19.38%) compared to QRVO (15.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPWR dropped -72.27% vs QRVO's -74.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.