PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOOD vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOOD vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 12.64% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.65% return.


MOOD

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
12.64%
6M
14.97%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
-2.65%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
8.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOOD vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
12.64%30.39%12.53%4.25%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-2.65%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and SHLD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

0.46

MOOD vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOOD
SHLD

Technology

27.6%
11.8%

Financial Services

15.7%

-

Industrials

12.6%
88.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Communication Services

7.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Basic Materials

4.4%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Technology

MOOD
27.6%
SHLD
11.8%

Financial Services

MOOD
15.7%
SHLD

-

Industrials

MOOD
12.6%
SHLD
88.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MOOD
9.5%
SHLD

-

Healthcare

MOOD
8.4%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

MOOD
7.9%
SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

MOOD
5.1%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

MOOD
4.4%
SHLD

-

Energy

MOOD
3.7%
SHLD

-

Utilities

MOOD
2.7%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

MOOD
2.5%
SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOOD vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOOD
MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOOD vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOODSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.08

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

0.45

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

1.16

+9.51

MOOD vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOOD and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOODSHLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

0.37

+1.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

1.98

-0.67

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOODSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-20.10%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-20.10%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-19.16%

+17.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-3.26%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

7.78%

-4.65%

Volatility

MOOD vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) is 3.59%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that MOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOODSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

7.64%

-4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

19.39%

-6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.33%

24.20%

-9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.10%

21.14%

-9.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.10%

21.14%

-9.04%

MOOD vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOOD vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SHLD's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
0.36%0.40%1.33%1.34%1.43%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOOD and SHLD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to MOOD (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, MOOD leads with 33.33% vs 8.97% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 33.33% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOOD.

SHLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.

MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: Relative Sentiment and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOOD and 0.50% for SHLD.

MOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOOD and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer