MOOD vs. KORU
MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) and KORU (Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment, while KORU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. MOOD is actively managed, while KORU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MOOD returned 19.89%/yr vs 90.94%/yr for KORU. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOOD charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for KORU.
Performance
MOOD vs. KORU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 12.64% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 290.75% return.
MOOD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 33.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KORU
- 1D
- 16.30%
- 1M
- -24.70%
- YTD
- 290.75%
- 6M
- 339.95%
- 1Y
- 1,038.83%
- 3Y*
- 90.94%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
MOOD vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 12.64% | 30.39% | 12.53% | 12.56% | -2.90% |
KORU Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 290.75% | 432.73% | -62.18% | 28.61% | -44.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOOD and KORU is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between MOOD and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
MOOD vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOOD
KORU
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
MOOD
KORU
Financial Services
MOOD
KORU
Industrials
MOOD
KORU
Consumer Cyclical
MOOD
KORU
Healthcare
MOOD
KORU
Communication Services
MOOD
KORU
Consumer Defensive
MOOD
KORU
Basic Materials
MOOD
KORU
Energy
MOOD
KORU
Utilities
MOOD
KORU
Real Estate
MOOD
KORU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOOD vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank
MOOD
KORU
MOOD vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOOD | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.57 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 17.10 | -13.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | 52.85 | -42.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOOD | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 7.91 | -5.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.07 | +1.24 |
Drawdowns
MOOD vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and KORU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOOD | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -95.79% | +81.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -61.39% | +51.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | -73.71% | +64.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -93.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -43.91% | +41.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -57.51% | +55.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 19.83% | -16.70% |
Volatility
MOOD vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) is 3.59%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 82.40%. This indicates that MOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOOD | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 82.40% | -78.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 125.52% | -112.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 132.99% | -118.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.10% | 87.63% | -75.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.10% | 81.26% | -69.16% |
MOOD vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOOD vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison
MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than KORU's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KORU Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 0.24% | 0.89% | 4.10% | 2.55% | 0.48% | 0.76% | 0.01% | 0.93% | 1.40% | 3.59% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOOD and KORU have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KORU has higher volatility (82.40%) compared to MOOD (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs KORU's -95.79%.
On 3-year performance, KORU leads with 90.94% vs 19.89% for MOOD. On fees, MOOD is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KORU has performed better with a 90.94% return vs 19.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOOD is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.
MOOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.24% for KORU.
MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while KORU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Relative Sentiment and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOOD and 1.29% for KORU.
KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.91 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOOD and KORU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer