PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MONC.MI vs. CA.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MONC.MI (Moncler SpA) and CA.PA (Carrefour SA) are both stocks. MONC.MI operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while CA.PA operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MONC.MI returned 15.74%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CA.PA. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Moncler SpA (MONC.MI) and Carrefour SA (CA.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MONC.MI achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than CA.PA's 21.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MONC.MI has outperformed CA.PA with an annualized return of 15.74%, while CA.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.38% annualized return.

MONC.MI

1D
1.83%
1M
5.31%
YTD
4.51%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
-1.90%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
15.74%

CA.PA

1D
1.02%
1M
0.73%
YTD
21.54%
6M
28.50%
1Y
33.66%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
0.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MONC.MI
Moncler SpA		4.51%10.17%-6.80%14.52%-21.57%28.76%25.13%40.08%11.72%59.09%
CA.PA
Carrefour SA		21.54%12.75%-12.48%9.48%-0.27%18.16%-4.68%3.02%-14.78%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MONC.MI and CA.PA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013

0.23

The correlation between MONC.MI and CA.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (5 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Moncler SpA

Carrefour SA

Often compared with MONC.MI:
MONC.MI vs. NOVO-B.COMONC.MI vs. EL.PAMONC.MI vs. PRY.MIMONC.MI vs. LULUMONC.MI vs. NKEMONC.MI vs. COKEMONC.MI vs. MC.PA
Often compared with CA.PA:
CA.PA vs. LVMUYCA.PA vs. WMTCA.PA vs. BNP.PACA.PA vs. SPYCA.PA vs. SW.PACA.PA vs. CLCA.PA vs. ^FCHI

Return for Risk

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MONC.MI
MONC.MI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MONC.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MONC.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MONC.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MONC.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MONC.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
CA.PA
CA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moncler SpA (MONC.MI) and Carrefour SA (CA.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MONC.MICA.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.21
1.54

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.57
2.05

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

3.57

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

9.11

-8.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MONC.MI Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the CA.PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MONC.MI and CA.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MONC.MICA.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

1.54

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.18

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.02

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.07

+0.47

Drawdowns

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MONC.MI drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, smaller than the maximum CA.PA drawdown of -72.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MONC.MI and CA.PA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MONC.MICA.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.80%

-72.97%

+27.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.65%

-9.48%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.97%

-28.78%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.80%

-33.80%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.80%

-45.14%

-0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.03%

-44.91%

+29.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.02%

-48.66%

+32.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.00%

3.59%

+5.41%

Volatility

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA - Volatility Comparison

Moncler SpA (MONC.MI) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to Carrefour SA (CA.PA) at 5.82%. This indicates that MONC.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CA.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MONC.MICA.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

5.82%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.45%

15.26%

+9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.61%

21.32%

+11.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.45%

22.99%

+9.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.25%

24.96%

+7.29%

Dividends

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA - Dividend Comparison

MONC.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than CA.PA's 5.95% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CA.PA
Carrefour SA		5.95%8.08%6.34%3.38%3.32%2.98%1.64%3.08%3.09%3.88%3.06%2.55%
MONC.MI
Moncler SpA		2.51%2.37%2.26%2.01%1.21%0.70%0.00%1.00%0.97%0.69%0.85%0.93%

Financials

MONC.MI vs. CA.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moncler SpA and Carrefour SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions

MONC.MI and CA.PA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MONC.MI and CA.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer