PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT vs. VGLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOAT vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than VGLT's -1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has outperformed VGLT with an annualized return of 13.45%, while VGLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.28% annualized return.


MOAT

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.23%
YTD
-1.74%
6M
-1.13%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
13.45%

VGLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
-0.94%
5Y*
-5.66%
10Y*
-1.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-1.74%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
-1.16%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and VGLT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012

-0.16

The correlation between MOAT and VGLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOAT vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOATVGLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

0.60

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.29

1.53

+1.76

MOAT vs. VGLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the VGLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and VGLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOATVGLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.48

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

-0.39

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

-0.09

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.18

+0.58

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and VGLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOATVGLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-46.18%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-7.01%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-17.68%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-40.98%

+17.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-46.18%

+12.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-37.30%

+31.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-15.08%

+11.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

2.72%

+1.29%

Volatility

MOAT vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) at 2.50%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOATVGLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.50%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

5.96%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.90%

8.71%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

14.57%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

13.82%

+4.87%

MOAT vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOAT vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than VGLT's 4.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.38%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.64%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOAT and VGLT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to VGLT (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs VGLT's -46.18%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.45% vs -1.28% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.45% return vs -1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 1.38% for MOAT.

MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VGLT is Government Bonds. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.03% for VGLT.

MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT and VGLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer