PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNT.TO vs. HXT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNT.TO achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than HXT.TO's 9.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MNT.TO having a 13.28% annualized return and HXT.TO not far behind at 12.85%.


MNT.TO

1D
-1.02%
1M
-9.25%
YTD
-4.27%
6M
-3.50%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
31.93%
5Y*
20.66%
10Y*
13.28%

HXT.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.53%
6M
11.58%
1Y
31.00%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves
-4.27%61.23%44.81%3.61%10.52%-10.51%26.14%13.47%5.87%5.52%
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
9.53%28.74%20.94%12.02%-6.27%28.11%5.36%22.18%-7.89%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MNT.TO and HXT.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2012

0.02

Over the past year, MNT.TO and HXT.TO have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNT.TO vs. HXT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNT.TO
MNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNT.TOHXT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.47

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

4.04

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

18.71

-16.10

MNT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNT.TO and HXT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNT.TOHXT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.62

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

1.13

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.85

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.26

+0.17

Drawdowns

MNT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum HXT.TO drawdown of -52.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNT.TO and HXT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNT.TOHXT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-52.13%

+17.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.01%

-7.71%

-17.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

-12.36%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.01%

-16.33%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

-35.48%

+1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.70%

-1.71%

-21.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.84%

-19.09%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.78%

1.66%

+8.12%

Volatility

MNT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) at 3.86%. This indicates that MNT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNT.TOHXT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

3.86%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.18%

9.53%

+15.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.27%

11.93%

+18.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

12.79%

+7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.58%

15.17%

+4.41%

Dividends

MNT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNT.TO nor HXT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MNT.TO and HXT.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNT.TO and HXT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer