PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNG.L vs. GRP.IR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MNG.L vs. GRP.IR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in M&G plc (MNG.L) and Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MNG.L is traded in GBp, while GRP.IR is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the GRP.IR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNG.L achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than GRP.IR's 15.61% return.


MNG.L

1D
0.38%
1M
3.50%
YTD
14.56%
6M
20.35%
1Y
38.16%
3Y*
26.25%
5Y*
15.06%
10Y*

GRP.IR

1D
0.00%
1M
1.40%
YTD
15.61%
6M
8.73%
1Y
11.82%
3Y*
-2.85%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNG.L vs. GRP.IR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MNG.L
M&G plc
14.56%58.44%-2.67%31.17%2.51%9.91%-11.33%7.82%
GRP.IR
Greencoat Renewables PLC
15.61%-3.66%-16.87%-5.91%11.84%-4.35%9.32%0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MNG.L and GRP.IR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2019

0.05

The correlation between MNG.L and GRP.IR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNG.L vs. GRP.IR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNG.L
MNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GRP.IR
GRP.IR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GRP.IR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNG.L vs. GRP.IR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&G plc (MNG.L) and Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNG.LGRP.IRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.12

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.01

+2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

2.16

+9.39

MNG.L vs. GRP.IR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the GRP.IR Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNG.L and GRP.IR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNG.LGRP.IRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

0.60

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

-0.03

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.11

+0.30

Drawdowns

MNG.L vs. GRP.IR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNG.L drawdown since its inception was -62.75%, which is greater than GRP.IR's maximum drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNG.L and GRP.IR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNG.LGRP.IRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.75%

-32.71%

-30.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.72%

-11.57%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-24.35%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.30%

-32.71%

+5.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-18.91%

+17.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.47%

-11.49%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

5.41%

-2.12%

Volatility

MNG.L vs. GRP.IR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for M&G plc (MNG.L) is 4.96%, while Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that MNG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRP.IR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNG.LGRP.IRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

7.91%

-2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.64%

16.84%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

19.54%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.10%

18.80%

+5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.63%

20.93%

+15.70%

Dividends

MNG.L vs. GRP.IR - Dividend Comparison

MNG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than GRP.IR's 8.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GRP.IR
Greencoat Renewables PLC
8.93%9.89%8.09%6.24%5.44%5.41%5.22%5.10%6.90%
MNG.L
M&G plc
6.55%7.05%10.01%8.95%9.80%9.19%4.98%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MNG.L vs. GRP.IR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between M&G plc and Greencoat Renewables PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MNG.L values in GBp, GRP.IR values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


MNG.L and GRP.IR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNG.L and GRP.IR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer