PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MLPD.L vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MLPD.L vs. VTI

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MLPD.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPD.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L returned 7.11%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for VTI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

MLPD.L vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 7.11%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.

MLPD.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.36%
YTD
18.82%
6M
14.62%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
7.11%

VTI

1D
0.30%
1M
0.44%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.94%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)		18.82%2.34%22.53%19.70%31.82%36.90%-31.38%7.22%-14.92%-8.67%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		9.05%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and VTI is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2013

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPD.L and VTI has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MLPD.L vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MLPD.L
VTI

Energy

96.7%
3.7%

Utilities

3.2%
2.3%

Industrials

0.2%
9.8%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

12.0%

Healthcare

-

9.2%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

33.5%

Energy

MLPD.L
96.7%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

MLPD.L
3.2%
VTI
2.3%

Industrials

MLPD.L
0.2%
VTI
9.8%

Basic Materials

MLPD.L

-

VTI
2.0%

Communication Services

MLPD.L

-

VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MLPD.L

-

VTI
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

MLPD.L

-

VTI
4.7%

Financial Services

MLPD.L

-

VTI
12.0%

Healthcare

MLPD.L

-

VTI
9.2%

Real Estate

MLPD.L

-

VTI
2.4%

Technology

MLPD.L

-

VTI
33.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Often compared with MLPD.L:
MLPD.L vs. MLPXMLPD.L vs. MLPAMLPD.L vs. TDIV.ASMLPD.L vs. EIPIXMLPD.L vs. JEPQMLPD.L vs. QYLDMLPD.L vs. MAIN
Often compared with VTI:
VTI vs. VOOVTI vs. VXUSVTI vs. SPYVTI vs. VTVTI vs. SCHDVTI vs. FZROXVTI vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MLPD.LVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.09
2.02

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.55
2.73

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.36

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.81

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

12.85

-8.16

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPD.L vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MLPD.LVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.02

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.71

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.81

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.50

-0.38

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and VTI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MLPD.LVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.22%

-55.45%

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-8.92%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.24%

-19.30%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-25.36%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

-35.00%

-40.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-2.64%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.08%

-8.02%

-20.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

1.95%

+1.38%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.88%. This indicates that MLPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MLPD.LVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

3.88%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

9.55%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

12.44%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.36%

17.44%

+2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.33%

18.33%

+10.00%

MLPD.L vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPD.L vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than VTI's 1.03% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)		7.56%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

MLPD.L and VTI have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.

MLPD.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPD.L and 0.03% for VTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer