MLPD.L vs. IWDA.AS
MLPD.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IWDA.AS (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPD.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IWDA.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L returned 7.11%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for IWDA.AS. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.AS.
Performance
MLPD.L vs. IWDA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MLPD.L is traded in USD, while IWDA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IWDA.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.AS's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L has underperformed IWDA.AS with an annualized return of 7.11%, while IWDA.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.07% annualized return.
MLPD.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 18.82%
- 6M
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- 15.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.84%
- 5Y*
- 16.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.11%
IWDA.AS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
MLPD.L vs. IWDA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 18.82% | 2.34% | 22.53% | 19.70% | 31.82% | 36.90% | -31.38% | 7.22% | -14.92% | -8.67% |
IWDA.AS iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.79% | 21.46% | 19.36% | 23.68% | -18.74% | 23.51% | 15.60% | 27.07% | -8.63% | 22.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPD.L and IWDA.AS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2013 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MLPD.L and IWDA.AS has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPD.L vs. IWDA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
MLPD.L
IWDA.AS
MLPD.L vs. IWDA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPD.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.40 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 3.05 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 13.16 | -8.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPD.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.22 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.75 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.81 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.68 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
MLPD.L vs. IWDA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than IWDA.AS's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and IWDA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPD.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.22% | -34.11% | -48.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -8.39% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.24% | -17.83% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.78% | -25.94% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.74% | -34.11% | -41.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -0.51% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.08% | -4.64% | -23.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 1.95% | +1.38% |
Volatility
MLPD.L vs. IWDA.AS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) at 2.94%. This indicates that MLPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPD.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 2.94% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.93% | 8.59% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 11.51% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 15.47% | +4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 15.80% | +12.53% |
MLPD.L vs. IWDA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.AS's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPD.L vs. IWDA.AS - Dividend Comparison
MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, while IWDA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.AS iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.56% | 8.21% | 8.18% | 8.60% | 7.98% | 8.57% | 11.03% | 10.06% | 9.87% | 8.15% | 8.14% | 9.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPD.L and IWDA.AS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.
MLPD.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while IWDA.AS is Global Equities. MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IWDA.AS tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPD.L and 0.20% for IWDA.AS.
Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and IWDA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer