PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPD.L vs. EWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPD.L vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than EWP's 5.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L has underperformed EWP with an annualized return of 7.11%, while EWP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.


MLPD.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.36%
YTD
18.82%
6M
14.62%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
7.11%

EWP

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
5.10%
6M
9.82%
1Y
33.13%
3Y*
30.85%
5Y*
16.75%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
18.82%2.34%22.53%19.70%31.82%36.90%-31.38%7.22%-14.92%-8.67%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
5.10%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and EWP is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2013

0.24

The correlation between MLPD.L and EWP shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPD.L vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPD.L
EWP

Energy

96.7%
5.3%

Utilities

3.2%
21.2%

Industrials

0.2%
16.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

41.4%

Healthcare

-

1.3%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

-

4.9%

Energy

MLPD.L
96.7%
EWP
5.3%

Utilities

MLPD.L
3.2%
EWP
21.2%

Industrials

MLPD.L
0.2%
EWP
16.1%

Basic Materials

MLPD.L

-

EWP

-

Communication Services

MLPD.L

-

EWP
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MLPD.L

-

EWP
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

MLPD.L

-

EWP

-

Financial Services

MLPD.L

-

EWP
41.4%

Healthcare

MLPD.L

-

EWP
1.3%

Real Estate

MLPD.L

-

EWP
2.9%

Technology

MLPD.L

-

EWP
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPD.LEWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.92

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

10.37

-5.69

MLPD.L vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPD.LEWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.77

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.83

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.52

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.31

-0.19

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than EWP's maximum drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and EWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPD.LEWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.22%

-61.19%

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-11.38%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.24%

-12.19%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-33.91%

+12.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

-46.36%

-29.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-2.96%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.08%

-21.43%

-6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.20%

+0.13%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) is 4.46%, while iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that MLPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPD.LEWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

5.07%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

15.70%

-4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

18.79%

-4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.36%

20.25%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.33%

22.24%

+6.09%

MLPD.L vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MLPD.L and EWP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

MLPD.L vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than EWP's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.16%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.56%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPD.L and EWP have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPD.L and EWP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

MLPD.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while EWP is Europe Equities. MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and EWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer