PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPD.L vs. BATS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPD.L vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MLPD.L is traded in USD, while BATS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BATS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than BATS.L's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L has outperformed BATS.L with an annualized return of 7.11%, while BATS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.61% annualized return.


MLPD.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.36%
YTD
18.82%
6M
14.62%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
7.11%

BATS.L

1D
1.53%
1M
2.50%
YTD
6.61%
6M
6.64%
1Y
33.10%
3Y*
32.48%
5Y*
17.13%
10Y*
6.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. BATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
18.82%2.34%22.53%19.70%31.82%36.90%-31.38%7.22%-14.92%-8.67%
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
6.61%68.15%34.95%-19.48%14.47%8.11%-6.84%43.84%-50.14%24.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and BATS.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2013

0.20

The correlation between MLPD.L and BATS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. BATS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BATS.L
BATS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BATS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BATS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPD.LBATS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.36

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

5.67

-0.99

MLPD.L vs. BATS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the BATS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and BATS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPD.LBATS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.44

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.79

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.27

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.26

-0.14

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than BATS.L's maximum drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and BATS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPD.LBATS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.22%

-56.29%

-25.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-13.98%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.24%

-14.60%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-30.31%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

-56.29%

-19.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-10.37%

+7.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.08%

-17.59%

-10.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

5.82%

-2.49%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) is 4.46%, while British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that MLPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPD.LBATS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

9.64%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

18.51%

-7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

22.90%

-8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.36%

21.79%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.33%

24.86%

+3.47%

Dividends

MLPD.L vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than BATS.L's 5.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
5.40%5.70%8.18%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%0.00%0.00%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.56%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPD.L and BATS.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and BATS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer