PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPA vs. USHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPA vs. USHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than USHY's 1.29% return.


MLPA

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.56%
YTD
16.25%
6M
14.54%
1Y
16.59%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
6.25%

USHY

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.85%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPA vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
16.25%5.73%20.35%15.93%27.03%39.64%-33.97%11.91%-15.71%5.24%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.29%8.81%8.45%12.73%-11.18%5.02%6.17%14.24%-2.41%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPA and USHY is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPA and USHY has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MLPA vs. USHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPA
USHY

Energy

96.9%
99.2%

Utilities

3.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

-

Energy

MLPA
96.9%
USHY
99.2%

Utilities

MLPA
3.1%
USHY

-

Basic Materials

MLPA

-

USHY

-

Communication Services

MLPA

-

USHY

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPA

-

USHY

-

Consumer Defensive

MLPA

-

USHY

-

Financial Services

MLPA

-

USHY

-

Healthcare

MLPA

-

USHY

-

Industrials

MLPA

-

USHY

-

Real Estate

MLPA

-

USHY
0.8%

Technology

MLPA

-

USHY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPA vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPA
MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPA vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPAUSHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.83

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

12.68

-6.64

MLPA vs. USHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the USHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPA and USHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPAUSHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.88

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.57

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.58

-0.41

Drawdowns

MLPA vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than USHY's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and USHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPAUSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.75%

-22.44%

-56.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-2.43%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-4.66%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

-15.56%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-0.41%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.26%

-2.66%

-17.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

0.54%

+2.21%

Volatility

MLPA vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison

Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that MLPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPAUSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

1.13%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

2.95%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

3.67%

+8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

7.34%

+10.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.47%

8.25%

+19.22%

MLPA vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than USHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPA vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison

MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than USHY's 6.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.27%7.82%7.25%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.84%9.09%10.00%8.05%7.15%9.29%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.93%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPA and USHY have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPA has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to USHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs USHY's -22.44%.

On 5-year performance, MLPA leads with 14.92% vs 4.16% for USHY. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MLPA has performed better with a 14.92% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MLPA.

MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 6.93% for USHY.

MLPA is categorized as MLPs, while USHY is High Yield Bonds. MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MLPA and 0.15% for USHY.

USHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPA and USHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer