MLPA vs. USHY
MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) and USHY (iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while USHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MLPA returned 14.92%/yr vs 4.16%/yr for USHY. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPA charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USHY.
Performance
MLPA vs. USHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than USHY's 1.29% return.
MLPA
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 16.25%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
USHY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.16%
- 10Y*
- —
MLPA vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 16.25% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | 39.64% | -33.97% | 11.91% | -15.71% | 5.24% |
USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 8.81% | 8.45% | 12.73% | -11.18% | 5.02% | 6.17% | 14.24% | -2.41% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPA and USHY is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MLPA and USHY has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MLPA vs. USHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPA
USHY
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
MLPA
USHY
Utilities
MLPA
USHY
-
Basic Materials
MLPA
-
USHY
-
Communication Services
MLPA
-
USHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
MLPA
-
USHY
-
Consumer Defensive
MLPA
-
USHY
-
Financial Services
MLPA
-
USHY
-
Healthcare
MLPA
-
USHY
-
Industrials
MLPA
-
USHY
-
Real Estate
MLPA
-
USHY
Technology
MLPA
-
USHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPA vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank
MLPA
USHY
MLPA vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPA | USHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.83 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 12.68 | -6.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPA | USHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.88 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.57 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.58 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
MLPA vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than USHY's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and USHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPA | USHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.75% | -22.44% | -56.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -2.43% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | -4.66% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.75% | -15.56% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -0.41% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.26% | -2.66% | -17.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 0.54% | +2.21% |
Volatility
MLPA vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison
Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that MLPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPA | USHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 1.13% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.41% | 2.95% | +5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 3.67% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 7.34% | +10.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 8.25% | +19.22% |
MLPA vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than USHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPA vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison
MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than USHY's 6.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.27% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.93% | 6.79% | 6.89% | 6.63% | 6.08% | 5.07% | 5.30% | 5.92% | 6.30% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPA and USHY have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPA has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to USHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs USHY's -22.44%.
On 5-year performance, MLPA leads with 14.92% vs 4.16% for USHY. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MLPA has performed better with a 14.92% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MLPA.
MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 6.93% for USHY.
MLPA is categorized as MLPs, while USHY is High Yield Bonds. MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MLPA and 0.15% for USHY.
USHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPA and USHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer