PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKA.L vs. PAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MKA.L vs. PAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MKA.L is traded in GBp, while PAC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PAC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKA.L achieves a -9.68% return, which is significantly higher than PAC's -14.02% return.


MKA.L

1D
2.44%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
-9.68%
6M
-16.00%
1Y
150.75%
3Y*
57.50%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*

PAC

1D
-1.91%
1M
-6.70%
YTD
-14.02%
6M
-5.58%
1Y
-3.03%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
21.49%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKA.L vs. PAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
-9.68%484.91%-30.87%-6.12%-60.48%77.14%103.49%-0.00%18.62%123.08%
PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
-14.02%45.17%6.01%22.21%22.85%31.18%-8.93%48.49%-10.66%20.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MKA.L and PAC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.06

The correlation between MKA.L and PAC shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MKA.L:

£146.26M

PAC:

$11.34B

EPS

MKA.L:

-£0.04

PAC:

$214.01

PS Ratio

MKA.L:

2.72K

PAC:

0.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

MKA.L:

£50.78K

PAC:

$32.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MKA.L:

-£544.15K

PAC:

$10.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

MKA.L:

-£17.87M

PAC:

$20.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MKA.L vs. PAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKA.L
MKA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MKA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MKA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PAC
PAC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKA.L vs. PAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MKA.LPACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.01

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

-0.12

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

-0.27

+6.24

MKA.L vs. PAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the PAC Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKA.L and PAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MKA.LPACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

-0.10

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.62

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.46

-0.18

Drawdowns

MKA.L vs. PAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKA.L drawdown since its inception was -88.80%, which is greater than PAC's maximum drawdown of -63.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKA.L and PAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MKA.LPACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.80%

-63.58%

-25.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.45%

-24.50%

-26.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.06%

-40.01%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.80%

-42.47%

-46.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.13%

-24.50%

-14.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.11%

-14.52%

-28.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.13%

11.42%

+13.71%

Volatility

MKA.L vs. PAC - Volatility Comparison

Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) has a higher volatility of 22.49% compared to Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) at 8.51%. This indicates that MKA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MKA.LPACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.49%

8.51%

+13.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.26%

25.24%

+23.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.38%

30.05%

+65.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.48%

35.03%

+42.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.06%

37.38%

+58.68%

Dividends

MKA.L vs. PAC - Dividend Comparison

MKA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
1.99%3.33%4.14%4.88%5.02%4.17%0.00%4.99%6.27%5.83%4.50%3.98%

Financials

MKA.L vs. PAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mkango Resources Ltd and Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
50.78K
11.37B
(MKA.L) Total Revenue
(PAC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MKA.L values in GBp, PAC values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MKA.L and PAC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MKA.L and PAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer