PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MINV.L vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MINV.L vs. VXUS

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MINV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while VXUS tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MINV.L returned 7.79%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for VXUS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.

Performance

MINV.L vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MINV.L is traded in GBp, while VXUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VXUS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINV.L achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MINV.L has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 7.79%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.

MINV.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.88%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.62%
1Y
2.83%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
7.79%

VXUS

1D
0.82%
1M
0.14%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.30%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINV.L vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		1.32%3.37%12.86%1.50%1.23%15.98%-1.05%18.84%3.17%7.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF		12.20%22.92%6.91%10.07%-6.10%10.02%7.41%17.11%-9.35%16.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MINV.L and VXUS is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between MINV.L and VXUS has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MINV.L vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MINV.L
VXUS

Technology

21.6%
18.1%

Financial Services

14.0%
22.3%

Healthcare

13.7%
7.1%

Communication Services

11.9%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
5.0%

Industrials

9.2%
16.1%

Utilities

7.7%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
8.4%

Energy

4.1%
5.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
7.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
2.6%

Technology

MINV.L
21.6%
VXUS
18.1%

Financial Services

MINV.L
14.0%
VXUS
22.3%

Healthcare

MINV.L
13.7%
VXUS
7.1%

Communication Services

MINV.L
11.9%
VXUS
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

MINV.L
10.9%
VXUS
5.0%

Industrials

MINV.L
9.2%
VXUS
16.1%

Utilities

MINV.L
7.7%
VXUS
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MINV.L
5.3%
VXUS
8.4%

Energy

MINV.L
4.1%
VXUS
5.2%

Basic Materials

MINV.L
1.1%
VXUS
7.6%

Real Estate

MINV.L
0.7%
VXUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF

Often compared with MINV.L:
MINV.L vs. MVEW.LMINV.L vs. CSH2.LMINV.L vs. FULVXMINV.L vs. MVEA.LMINV.L vs. SPYMINV.L vs. VOOMINV.L vs. AOR
Often compared with VXUS:
VXUS vs. VTIVXUS vs. VOOVXUS vs. VTVXUS vs. VEAVXUS vs. FZILXVXUS vs. VEUVXUS vs. SCHF

Return for Risk

MINV.L vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINV.L vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MINV.LVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.36
2.21

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.58
2.90

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.43

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.89

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

11.70

-10.49

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MINV.L vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINV.L and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MINV.LVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

2.21

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.71

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.68

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.49

-0.15

Drawdowns

MINV.L vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINV.L drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -28.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV.L and VXUS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MINV.LVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-28.73%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

-9.99%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-13.06%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-14.57%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.38%

-28.73%

+8.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-2.81%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-5.11%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.47%

-0.13%

Volatility

MINV.L vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) is 2.52%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that MINV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MINV.LVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

5.01%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.84%

11.33%

-5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.91%

13.12%

-5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

13.01%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

15.48%

-0.08%

MINV.L vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

MINV.L vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF		2.73%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

MINV.L and VXUS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINV.L and 0.05% for VXUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINV.L and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer