PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINT vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINT vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than VCSH's 0.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MINT having a 2.71% annualized return and VCSH not far behind at 2.66%.


MINT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.21%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
2.71%

VCSH

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.92%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5.56%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINT vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
1.86%4.74%5.94%6.26%-1.01%-0.03%1.62%3.34%1.72%1.86%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.44%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MINT and VCSH is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

0.28

The correlation between MINT and VCSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINT vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT
MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINTVCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+14.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+61.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

20.44

1.48

+18.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

93.88

3.27

+90.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

935.03

13.41

+921.61

MINT vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINT Sharpe Ratio is 17.14, which is higher than the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINTVCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14

2.45

+14.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

6.01

0.79

+5.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.88

0.80

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.47

1.01

+1.46

Drawdowns

MINT vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT drawdown since its inception was -4.62%, smaller than the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINTVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-12.86%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.05%

-1.40%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.16%

-1.40%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.42%

-9.48%

+7.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.62%

-12.86%

+8.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.52%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-0.97%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.34%

-0.34%

Volatility

MINT vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) is 0.09%, while Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that MINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINTVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

0.61%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.20%

1.41%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27%

1.87%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

2.88%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

3.35%

-2.40%

MINT vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINT has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINT vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than VCSH's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
4.28%4.63%5.22%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINT and VCSH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCSH has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINT dropped -4.62% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

On 10-year performance, MINT leads with 2.71% vs 2.66% for VCSH. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MINT has performed better with a 2.71% return vs 2.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.

VCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 4.28% for MINT.

MINT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while VCSH is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MINT and 0.04% for VCSH.

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.14 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINT and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer