PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDLX vs. PDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDLX vs. PDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDLX achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly higher than PDI's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDLX has underperformed PDI with an annualized return of 6.41%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively higher 7.56% annualized return.


MIDLX

1D
-2.35%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
3.83%
6M
4.94%
1Y
7.50%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
6.41%

PDI

1D
-0.54%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
0.27%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
10.92%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
7.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDLX vs. PDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
3.83%17.03%3.33%13.21%-18.52%5.17%10.15%24.97%-10.29%30.65%
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
0.27%11.03%17.18%11.99%-16.99%7.81%-9.96%22.23%7.35%18.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDLX and PDI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2012

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDLX vs. PDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDLX
MIDLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MIDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PDI
PDI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDLX vs. PDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDLXPDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.05

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

0.18

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.20

0.39

+1.82

MIDLX vs. PDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the PDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDLX and PDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDLXPDIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.17

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.16

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.40

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Drawdowns

MIDLX vs. PDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDLX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum PDI drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDLX and PDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDLXPDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-46.47%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.75%

-10.95%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-17.55%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.58%

-27.23%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

-46.47%

+11.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

-7.57%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-6.22%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

4.98%

-1.56%

Volatility

MIDLX vs. PDI - Volatility Comparison

MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) at 3.21%. This indicates that MIDLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDLXPDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.21%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

8.14%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

11.24%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

15.53%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.02%

19.05%

-5.03%

Dividends

MIDLX vs. PDI - Dividend Comparison

MIDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than PDI's 15.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
3.25%3.37%10.08%4.21%5.85%5.19%4.03%4.36%6.82%1.63%1.09%1.25%
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
15.84%14.94%14.43%14.74%17.84%10.21%10.01%9.45%10.78%8.81%14.79%18.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDLX and PDI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIDLX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to PDI (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDLX dropped -34.70% vs PDI's -46.47%.

MIDLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDLX and PDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer