PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGC vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGC vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MGC has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 16.13%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.65% annualized return.


MGC

1D
0.42%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.48%
6M
8.46%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
22.88%
5Y*
14.25%
10Y*
16.13%

SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGC vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
8.48%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%21.57%31.14%-3.45%22.61%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MGC and SCHD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between MGC and SCHD has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MGC vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGC
SCHD

Technology

39.3%
16.4%

Communication Services

13.1%
6.3%

Financial Services

11.7%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
6.3%

Healthcare

8.9%
18.8%

Industrials

6.5%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
19.2%

Energy

2.6%
16.2%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.2%

Utilities

1.0%
0.0%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Technology

MGC
39.3%
SCHD
16.4%

Communication Services

MGC
13.1%
SCHD
6.3%

Financial Services

MGC
11.7%
SCHD
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MGC
10.1%
SCHD
6.3%

Healthcare

MGC
8.9%
SCHD
18.8%

Industrials

MGC
6.5%
SCHD
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

MGC
4.8%
SCHD
19.2%

Energy

MGC
2.6%
SCHD
16.2%

Basic Materials

MGC
1.2%
SCHD
1.2%

Utilities

MGC
1.0%
SCHD
0.0%

Real Estate

MGC
1.0%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGC vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGC vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGCSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

5.74

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

14.06

-2.15

MGC vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGC and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGCSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.43

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.59

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.76

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.86

-0.27

Drawdowns

MGC vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGCSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.93%

-33.37%

-18.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-4.61%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

-16.13%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-16.85%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

-33.37%

+0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-1.64%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-3.32%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.88%

+0.32%

Volatility

MGC vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGCSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

2.83%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

7.60%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

10.94%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

14.38%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

16.72%

+1.52%

MGC vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGC vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.89%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGC and SCHD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGC has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -51.93% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 16.13% vs 12.65% for SCHD. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 16.13% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.89% for MGC.

MGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGC and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer