PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFC vs. AMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MFC vs. AMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) and Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFC achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than AMG's 16.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MFC has outperformed AMG with an annualized return of 15.88%, while AMG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.09% annualized return.


MFC

1D
0.46%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
9.27%
6M
13.46%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
32.27%
5Y*
19.18%
10Y*
15.88%

AMG

1D
-0.06%
1M
11.17%
YTD
16.78%
6M
24.59%
1Y
84.69%
3Y*
31.53%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFC vs. AMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFC
Manulife Financial Corporation
9.27%22.95%45.75%31.13%-1.18%12.17%-7.18%49.19%-29.89%22.17%
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
16.78%55.93%22.15%-4.40%-3.67%61.80%20.53%-11.79%-52.15%41.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MFC and AMG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999

0.51

The correlation between MFC and AMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MFC:

$46.97B

AMG:

$9.26B

EPS

MFC:

$4.06

AMG:

$24.29

PE Ratio

MFC:

9.59

AMG:

13.86

PEG Ratio

MFC:

3.36

AMG:

0.46

PS Ratio

MFC:

0.78

AMG:

4.42

PB Ratio

MFC:

1.07

AMG:

3.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

MFC:

$79.35B

AMG:

$2.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MFC:

$26.46B

AMG:

$1.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

MFC:

$8.26B

AMG:

$1.53B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFC vs. AMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFC
MFC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AMG
AMG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFC vs. AMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) and Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFCAMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.47

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

4.32

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

12.31

-6.90

MFC vs. AMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the AMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFC and AMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFCAMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.75

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.49

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.23

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.26

+0.08

Drawdowns

MFC vs. AMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFC drawdown since its inception was -83.61%, roughly equal to the maximum AMG drawdown of -85.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFC and AMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFCAMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.61%

-85.92%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-19.72%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.75%

-26.97%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

-41.22%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.44%

-78.52%

+21.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.06%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.41%

-24.72%

-4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

6.90%

-2.26%

Volatility

MFC vs. AMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) is 7.84%, while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that MFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFCAMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

9.00%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

25.55%

-9.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.72%

31.02%

-10.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.13%

32.41%

-8.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.42%

34.72%

-6.30%

Dividends

MFC vs. AMG - Dividend Comparison

MFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than AMG's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
0.01%0.01%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.34%1.51%1.23%0.39%0.00%0.00%
MFC
Manulife Financial Corporation
3.43%3.45%4.16%4.86%5.71%4.91%4.70%3.71%4.08%3.93%4.15%5.38%

Financials

MFC vs. AMG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manulife Financial Corporation and Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-40.00B-20.00B0.0020.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
12.31B
544.90M
(MFC) Total Revenue
(AMG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MFC vs. AMG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Manulife Financial Corporation and Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
81.0%
Portfolio components
MFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.31B and revenue of 12.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

AMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 441.50M and revenue of 544.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

MFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

AMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 77.40M and revenue of 544.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

MFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

AMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. reported a net income of 110.40M and revenue of 544.90M, resulting in a net margin of 20.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MFC and AMG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMG has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to MFC (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFC dropped -83.61% vs AMG's -85.92%.

AMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFC and AMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer