MEUD.L vs. NBIS
MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) is Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) is a stock. Over the past year, MEUD.L returned 18.55% vs 357.72% for NBIS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MEUD.L vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MEUD.L is traded in GBp, while NBIS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NBIS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 162.98% return.
MEUD.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 18.55%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
NBIS
- 1D
- -4.34%
- 1M
- 25.79%
- YTD
- 162.98%
- 6M
- 116.92%
- 1Y
- 357.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEUD.L vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 6.17% | 26.51% | -3.44% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 162.98% | 180.66% | 52.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEUD.L and NBIS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEUD.L vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
MEUD.L
NBIS
MEUD.L vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEUD.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 7.79 | -6.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 18.04 | -11.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEUD.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 3.46 | -1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 3.13 | -2.68 |
Drawdowns
MEUD.L vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum NBIS drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEUD.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | -59.36% | +30.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -46.25% | +35.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -16.88% | +15.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.90% | -19.30% | +12.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 19.95% | -17.04% |
Volatility
MEUD.L vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) is 3.16%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 33.84%. This indicates that MEUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEUD.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 33.84% | -30.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 70.85% | -60.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 104.35% | -92.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 110.68% | -94.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 110.68% | -93.74% |
Dividends
MEUD.L vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither MEUD.L nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEUD.L and NBIS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer