METL vs. TBIL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and TBIL (F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott, while TBIL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index. METL is actively managed, while TBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TBIL.

Performance

METL vs. TBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than TBIL's 1.55% return.

METL

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -9.97%
• YTD: 7.51%
• 6M: 15.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TBIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METL vs. TBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	7.51%	27.04%
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF	1.55%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between METL and TBIL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

METL vs. TBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBIL

TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METL vs. TBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METL	TBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	14.08	-12.91

Drawdowns

METL vs. TBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, which is greater than TBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and TBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	METL	TBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.39%	-0.10%	-27.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.48%	0.00%	-18.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-0.00%	-8.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METL	TBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.85%	0.29%	+44.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.85%	0.32%	+44.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.85%	0.32%	+44.53%

METL vs. TBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than TBIL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

METL vs. TBIL - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than TBIL's 3.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.92%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF	3.82%	4.07%	5.02%	5.00%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METL and TBIL in my portfolio?

METL and TBIL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METL or TBIL?

On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METL or TBIL?

TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METL or TBIL?

TBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 0.92% for METL.

What is the main difference between METL and TBIL?

METL is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while TBIL is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.15% for TBIL.