METL vs. DBO
METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. METL is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
METL vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.92% return.
METL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 79.92%
- 6M
- 76.90%
- 1Y
- 73.53%
- 3Y*
- 21.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
METL vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 7.51% | 27.04% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.92% | -7.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and DBO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METL vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
METL
DBO
METL vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.02 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
METL vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.39% | -90.18% | +62.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.48% | -52.65% | +34.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -62.24% | +54.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.97% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.85% | 34.72% | +10.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.85% | 32.34% | +12.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.85% | 31.80% | +13.05% |
METL vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
METL vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METL and DBO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.92% for METL.
METL is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.78% for DBO.
Find the right allocation for METL and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer