META vs. CNSWF
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) and CNSWF (Constellation Software Inc) are both stocks. META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while CNSWF operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.60%/yr vs 18.35%/yr for CNSWF. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. CNSWF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with META having a -11.24% return and CNSWF slightly lower at -11.52%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with META having a 17.60% annualized return and CNSWF not far ahead at 18.35%.
META
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- -11.24%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- 1Y
- -15.84%
- 3Y*
- 30.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.60%
CNSWF
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 13.17%
- YTD
- -11.52%
- 6M
- -11.81%
- 1Y
- -40.43%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
META vs. CNSWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -11.24% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
CNSWF Constellation Software Inc | -11.52% | -22.46% | 24.90% | 59.77% | -15.99% | 43.09% | 34.48% | 53.34% | 6.04% | 33.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and CNSWF is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.28 |
The correlation between META and CNSWF shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
META:
$1.50T
CNSWF:
$44.97B
META:
$27.47
CNSWF:
$34.82
META:
21.31
CNSWF:
60.95
META:
0.88
CNSWF:
3.23
META:
7.00
CNSWF:
3.71
META:
6.16
CNSWF:
11.54
META:
$214.96B
CNSWF:
$12.11B
META:
$176.14B
CNSWF:
$4.15B
META:
$106.31B
CNSWF:
$2.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. CNSWF — Risk / Return Rank
META
CNSWF
META vs. CNSWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| META | CNSWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.84 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | -0.74 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | -1.12 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| META | CNSWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 | -0.99 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.26 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.64 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.99 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
META vs. CNSWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than CNSWF's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and CNSWF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | CNSWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -55.25% | -21.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -55.12% | +21.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -55.25% | +21.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -55.25% | -21.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -55.25% | -21.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.73% | -42.73% | +17.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.26% | -6.89% | -8.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.69% | 36.19% | -20.50% |
Volatility
META vs. CNSWF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 10.48%, while Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) has a volatility of 13.34%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNSWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | CNSWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.48% | 13.34% | -2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.95% | 33.23% | -6.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.56% | 40.92% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.05% | 29.94% | +14.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.69% | 28.86% | +9.83% |
Dividends
META vs. CNSWF - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than CNSWF's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNSWF Constellation Software Inc | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.13% | 0.16% | 0.26% | 0.22% | 0.41% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.76% | 0.96% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
META vs. CNSWF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and Constellation Software Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
META vs. CNSWF - Profitability Comparison
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
CNSWF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported a gross profit of 733.69M and revenue of 3.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.
CNSWF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported an operating income of 452.64M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.
CNSWF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported a net income of 361.92M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
META and CNSWF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNSWF has higher volatility (13.34%) compared to META (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs CNSWF's -55.25%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and CNSWF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer