PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MDA.TO having a 102.74% return and NEO.TO slightly higher at 106.26%.


MDA.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
14.28%
YTD
102.74%
6M
121.26%
1Y
82.47%
3Y*
87.15%
5Y*
29.55%
10Y*

NEO.TO

1D
3.43%
1M
9.90%
YTD
106.26%
6M
93.76%
1Y
195.65%
3Y*
63.99%
5Y*
16.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MDA.TO
MDA Space Ltd.
102.74%-9.79%156.34%80.00%-32.63%-32.81%
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
106.26%101.35%10.42%-16.66%-51.09%-3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MDA.TO and NEO.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDA.TO:

CA$7.17B

NEO.TO:

CA$1.33B

EPS

MDA.TO:

CA$0.81

NEO.TO:

-CA$0.24

PS Ratio

MDA.TO:

4.00

NEO.TO:

2.66

PB Ratio

MDA.TO:

3.88

NEO.TO:

3.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDA.TO:

CA$1.75B

NEO.TO:

CA$511.45M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDA.TO:

CA$366.40M

NEO.TO:

CA$147.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

MDA.TO:

CA$291.70M

NEO.TO:

CA$61.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDA.TO
MDA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MDA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

NEO.TO
NEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDA.TONEO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

6.00

-4.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.32

12.49

-9.17

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDA.TO and NEO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDA.TONEO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

3.09

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.30

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.21

+0.38

Drawdowns

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDA.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.33%, smaller than the maximum NEO.TO drawdown of -72.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDA.TO and NEO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDA.TONEO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.33%

-72.44%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.77%

-32.83%

-20.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.77%

-37.56%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.68%

-72.44%

+6.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.54%

-10.53%

-9.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-34.93%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.95%

15.74%

+9.21%

Volatility

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO) is 19.65%, while Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) has a volatility of 24.69%. This indicates that MDA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDA.TONEO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.65%

24.69%

-5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.14%

44.28%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.12%

63.94%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.14%

53.45%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.23%

52.37%

-3.14%

Dividends

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO - Dividend Comparison

MDA.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MDA.TO
MDA Space Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
1.25%2.57%5.01%5.24%4.17%1.97%2.90%3.20%2.47%

Financials

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MDA Space Ltd. and Neo Performance Materials Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
464.10M
152.42M
(MDA.TO) Total Revenue
(NEO.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

MDA.TO vs. NEO.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MDA Space Ltd. and Neo Performance Materials Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
18.1%
31.4%
Portfolio components
MDA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDA Space Ltd. reported a gross profit of 84.00M and revenue of 464.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.1%.

NEO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.82M and revenue of 152.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

MDA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDA Space Ltd. reported an operating income of 32.30M and revenue of 464.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

NEO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported an operating income of 26.12M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

MDA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDA Space Ltd. reported a net income of 29.60M and revenue of 464.10M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

NEO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a net income of -1.62M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in a net margin of -1.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDA.TO and NEO.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDA.TO and NEO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer