PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCO vs. RR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCO vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Moody's Corporation (MCO) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MCO is traded in USD, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCO achieves a -12.74% return, which is significantly lower than RR.L's 8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MCO has underperformed RR.L with an annualized return of 17.28%, while RR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.65% annualized return.


MCO

1D
-1.68%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
-12.74%
6M
-8.49%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
17.28%

RR.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.01%
YTD
8.99%
6M
14.37%
1Y
41.49%
3Y*
108.75%
5Y*
60.80%
10Y*
19.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCO vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCO
Moody's Corporation
-12.74%8.74%22.17%41.52%-27.80%35.57%23.26%71.26%-4.10%58.53%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
8.99%120.24%86.56%238.53%-32.26%9.45%-51.10%-13.17%-6.26%39.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MCO and RR.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.26

The correlation between MCO and RR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MCO:

$78.68B

RR.L:

£105.78B

EPS

MCO:

$13.92

RR.L:

£0.99

PE Ratio

MCO:

31.87

RR.L:

12.70

PEG Ratio

MCO:

4.16

RR.L:

0.03

PS Ratio

MCO:

10.10

RR.L:

2.65

PB Ratio

MCO:

26.28

RR.L:

38.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCO:

$7.87B

RR.L:

£40.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCO:

$5.49B

RR.L:

£10.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

MCO:

$3.95B

RR.L:

£9.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCO vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCO
MCO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

RR.L
RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCO vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moody's Corporation (MCO) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCORR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.21

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

2.07

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

5.93

-6.72

MCO vs. RR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the RR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCO and RR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCORR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

1.10

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

1.39

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.39

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.20

+0.28

Drawdowns

MCO vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCO drawdown since its inception was -78.72%, smaller than the maximum RR.L drawdown of -92.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCO and RR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCORR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.72%

-92.32%

+13.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.61%

-19.98%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.65%

-23.51%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.66%

-64.03%

+22.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

-89.47%

+47.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.39%

-7.50%

-9.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-36.66%

+18.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.80%

6.97%

+3.83%

Volatility

MCO vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Moody's Corporation (MCO) is 7.28%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a volatility of 12.27%. This indicates that MCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCORR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

12.27%

-4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.95%

32.28%

-10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.32%

37.67%

-11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.32%

43.89%

-17.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.84%

50.20%

-22.36%

Dividends

MCO vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison

MCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than RR.L's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCO
Moody's Corporation
0.89%0.74%0.72%0.79%1.26%0.63%0.77%0.84%1.26%1.03%1.57%1.36%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
0.75%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%1.41%0.54%1.75%4.06%

Financials

MCO vs. RR.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moody's Corporation and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
2.08B
11.72B
(MCO) Total Revenue
(RR.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MCO values in USD, RR.L values in GBp

MCO vs. RR.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Moody's Corporation and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
74.5%
27.4%
Portfolio components
MCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moody's Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.55B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.5%.

RR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

MCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moody's Corporation reported an operating income of 922.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.4%.

RR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

MCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moody's Corporation reported a net income of 661.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of 31.8%.

RR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MCO and RR.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCO and RR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer