MCHP vs. YUM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MCHP (Microchip Technology Incorporated) and YUM (YUM! Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. MCHP operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while YUM operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, MCHP returned 15.50%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for YUM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MCHP vs. YUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHP achieves a 44.96% return, which is significantly higher than YUM's -1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHP has outperformed YUM with an annualized return of 15.50%, while YUM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.56% annualized return.

MCHP

• 1D: 3.43%
• 1M: -7.33%
• YTD: 44.96%
• 6M: 37.15%
• 1Y: 43.83%
• 3Y*: 7.14%
• 5Y*: 6.01%
• 10Y*: 15.50%

YUM

• 1D: -2.32%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: -1.66%
• 6M: 4.38%
• 1Y: 3.71%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 6.61%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHP vs. YUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated	44.96%	14.61%	-34.96%	30.90%	-17.98%	27.49%	33.73%	48.02%	-16.71%	39.46%
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc.	-1.66%	14.94%	4.72%	3.93%	-5.99%	30.05%	9.85%	11.41%	14.61%	31.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHP and YUM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 1997	0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between MCHP and YUM has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS MCHP : $0.43 YUM : $6.21
PE Ratio MCHP : 212.69 YUM : 23.72
PEG Ratio MCHP : 3.21 YUM : 10.70
PS Ratio MCHP : 7.87 YUM : 4.86
Total Revenue (TTM) MCHP : $4.71B YUM : $8.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) MCHP : $2.72B YUM : $3.88B
EBITDA (TTM) MCHP : $1.02B YUM : $2.83B

Return for Risk

MCHP vs. YUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHP

MCHP Risk / Return Rank: 69
MCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
MCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
MCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 70

YUM

YUM Risk / Return Rank: 46
YUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
YUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
YUM Omega Ratio Rank: 40
YUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
YUM Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHP vs. YUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCHP	YUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.17	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	0.40	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.05	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	0.30	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.40	0.73	+2.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCHP vs. YUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the YUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHP and YUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCHP	YUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.17	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.33	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.51	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.48	-0.05

Drawdowns

MCHP vs. YUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHP drawdown since its inception was -63.77%, smaller than the maximum YUM drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHP and YUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCHP	YUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.77%	-67.69%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.41%	-12.41%	-22.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.77%	-16.10%	-47.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.77%	-23.10%	-40.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.77%	-52.17%	-11.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.78%	-11.93%	+1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-12.38%	-4.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.93%	5.07%	+7.86%

Volatility

MCHP vs. YUM - Volatility Comparison

Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) has a higher volatility of 14.52% compared to YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 6.38%. This indicates that MCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCHP	YUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.52%	6.38%	+8.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.67%	14.94%	+16.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.78%	21.80%	+21.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.07%	20.43%	+23.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.86%	22.74%	+19.12%

Dividends

MCHP vs. YUM - Dividend Comparison

MCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, which matches YUM's 1.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated	1.99%	2.86%	3.16%	1.76%	1.65%	0.98%	1.07%	1.40%	2.02%	1.65%	2.24%	3.07%
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc.	1.98%	1.88%	2.00%	1.85%	1.78%	1.44%	1.73%	1.67%	1.57%	1.47%	41.26%	2.31%

Financials

MCHP vs. YUM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Microchip Technology Incorporated and YUM! Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MCHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported a gross profit of 967.30M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.8%.

YUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 920.00M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

MCHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported an operating income of 211.10M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

YUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 644.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

MCHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported a net income of 116.40M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

YUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCHP and YUM in my portfolio?

MCHP and YUM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCHP or YUM?

MCHP has higher volatility (14.52%) compared to YUM (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHP dropped -63.77% vs YUM's -67.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.