MCD vs. QBTS
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. MCD operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, MCD returned 1.30%/yr vs 125.25%/yr for QBTS. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MCD vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -7.98% return, which is significantly lower than QBTS's -1.22% return.
MCD
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -7.98%
- 6M
- -9.22%
- 1Y
- -7.43%
- 3Y*
- 1.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
QBTS
- 1D
- 8.30%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -9.18%
- 1Y
- 38.72%
- 3Y*
- 125.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCD vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -7.98% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 2.79% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -1.22% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCD and QBTS is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | -0.01 |
Fundamentals
MCD:
$198.20B
QBTS:
$9.49B
MCD:
$12.13
QBTS:
-$1.08
MCD:
7.24
QBTS:
704.19
MCD:
$27.45B
QBTS:
$12.44M
MCD:
$12.10B
QBTS:
$8.25M
MCD:
$14.46B
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCD vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
MCD
QBTS
MCD vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCD | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.15 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.55 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 0.96 | -1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCD | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 | 0.36 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.19 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
MCD vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCD | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -96.67% | +23.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.05% | -71.01% | +51.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -79.17% | +60.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.54% | -42.32% | +24.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -65.80% | +50.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.34% | 40.50% | -33.16% |
Volatility
MCD vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is 5.54%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.76%. This indicates that MCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCD | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 42.76% | -37.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 76.88% | -64.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 108.49% | -91.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 151.19% | -133.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 151.19% | -130.78% |
Dividends
MCD vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.65% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MCD vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McDonald's Corporation and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MCD and QBTS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.76%) compared to MCD (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCD dropped -73.20% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCD and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer