PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCD vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCD vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -7.98% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MCD has underperformed CB with an annualized return of 11.19%, while CB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


MCD

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-7.98%
6M
-9.22%
1Y
-7.43%
3Y*
1.30%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
11.19%

CB

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.43%
6M
8.96%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCD vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
-7.98%7.89%0.14%15.06%0.51%27.79%11.30%13.97%5.78%45.05%
CB
Chubb Limited
3.43%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MCD and CB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1993

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MCD:

$198.20B

CB:

$127.01B

EPS

MCD:

$12.13

CB:

$28.35

PE Ratio

MCD:

22.90

CB:

11.35

PEG Ratio

MCD:

3.68

CB:

0.79

PS Ratio

MCD:

7.24

CB:

2.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCD:

$27.45B

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCD:

$12.10B

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

MCD:

$14.46B

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCD vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCD
MCD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCD Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCD vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCDCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.12

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

1.18

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

2.70

-3.72

MCD vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCD Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCD and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCDCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

0.62

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.78

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.40

+0.13

Drawdowns

MCD vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCDCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.20%

-50.99%

-22.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.05%

-9.36%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-14.35%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.05%

-19.26%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.90%

-42.59%

+5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.54%

-5.81%

-11.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.90%

-10.68%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.34%

4.52%

+2.82%

Volatility

MCD vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is 5.54%, while Chubb Limited (CB) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that MCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCDCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

6.11%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

13.14%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

17.69%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

20.34%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

23.69%

-3.28%

Dividends

MCD vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than CB's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CB
Chubb Limited
1.21%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
2.65%2.35%2.34%2.10%2.15%1.96%2.35%2.39%2.36%2.23%2.97%2.91%

Financials

MCD vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McDonald's Corporation and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
6.52B
1.88B
(MCD) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MCD and CB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CB has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to MCD (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCD dropped -73.20% vs CB's -50.99%.

CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCD and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer