PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCD vs. BTQ.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCD vs. BTQ.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MCD is traded in USD, while BTQ.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BTQ.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -7.98% return, which is significantly higher than BTQ.NEO's -17.44% return.


MCD

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-7.98%
6M
-9.22%
1Y
-7.43%
3Y*
1.30%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
11.19%

BTQ.NEO

1D
3.73%
1M
39.02%
YTD
-17.44%
6M
-35.31%
1Y
37.44%
3Y*
106.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCD vs. BTQ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
-7.98%7.89%0.14%12.31%
BTQ.NEO
BTQ Technologies Corp
-17.44%88.56%342.98%11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MCD and BTQ.NEO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2023

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MCD:

$198.20B

BTQ.NEO:

CA$821.41M

EPS

MCD:

$12.13

BTQ.NEO:

-CA$0.11

PS Ratio

MCD:

7.24

BTQ.NEO:

1.42K

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCD:

$27.45B

BTQ.NEO:

CA$565.50K

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCD:

$12.10B

BTQ.NEO:

CA$565.50K

EBITDA (TTM)

MCD:

$14.46B

BTQ.NEO:

-CA$14.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCD vs. BTQ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCD
MCD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCD Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BTQ.NEO
BTQ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BTQ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTQ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTQ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BTQ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTQ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCD vs. BTQ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCDBTQ.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.18

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

0.45

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

0.64

-1.66

MCD vs. BTQ.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCD Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the BTQ.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCD and BTQ.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCDBTQ.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

0.24

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.51

+0.02

Drawdowns

MCD vs. BTQ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, smaller than the maximum BTQ.NEO drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and BTQ.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCDBTQ.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.20%

-84.79%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.05%

-84.79%

+65.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-84.79%

+65.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.54%

-69.88%

+52.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.90%

-47.31%

+32.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.34%

59.10%

-51.76%

Volatility

MCD vs. BTQ.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is 5.54%, while BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO) has a volatility of 42.02%. This indicates that MCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTQ.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCDBTQ.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

42.02%

-36.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

84.92%

-72.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

161.69%

-145.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

172.11%

-154.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

172.11%

-151.70%

Dividends

MCD vs. BTQ.NEO - Dividend Comparison

MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while BTQ.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTQ.NEO
BTQ Technologies Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
2.65%2.35%2.34%2.10%2.15%1.96%2.35%2.39%2.36%2.23%2.97%2.91%

Financials

MCD vs. BTQ.NEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McDonald's Corporation and BTQ Technologies Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
6.52B
0
(MCD) Total Revenue
(BTQ.NEO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MCD values in USD, BTQ.NEO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


MCD and BTQ.NEO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCD and BTQ.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer