MATIC-USD vs. TRX-USD

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MATIC-USD (Polygon USD) and TRX-USD (Tronix) are both cryptocurrencies. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MATIC-USD vs. TRX-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polygon USD (MATIC-USD) and Tronix (TRX-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MATIC-USD

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRX-USD

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -7.01%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 6M: 15.78%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 65.45%
• 5Y*: 34.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATIC-USD vs. TRX-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MATIC-USD Polygon USD	0.00%	-29.46%	-53.57%	28.05%	-69.98%	14,215.20%	27.71%	205.40%
TRX-USD Tronix	14.63%	11.86%	135.87%	97.75%	-27.86%	180.88%	102.08%	-44.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MATIC-USD and TRX-USD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2019	0.49

The correlation between MATIC-USD and TRX-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MATIC-USD vs. TRX-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRX-USD

TRX-USD Risk / Return Rank: 94
TRX-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TRX-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TRX-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TRX-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TRX-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MATIC-USD vs. TRX-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polygon USD (MATIC-USD) and Tronix (TRX-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MATIC-USD	TRX-USD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.60	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MATIC-USD	TRX-USD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-95.89%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.58%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-24.78%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-62.54%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	13.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MATIC-USD	TRX-USD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	24.31%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	58.52%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	110.30%	—

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MATIC-USD and TRX-USD in my portfolio?

MATIC-USD and TRX-USD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.