MARA vs. SVM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MARA (MARA Holdings, Inc.) and SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) are both stocks. MARA operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while SVM operates in Silver (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MARA returned -10.80%/yr vs 18.19%/yr for SVM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MARA vs. SVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARA achieves a 53.45% return, which is significantly higher than SVM's 27.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MARA has underperformed SVM with an annualized return of -10.80%, while SVM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.19% annualized return.

MARA

• 1D: 11.85%
• 1M: 6.49%
• YTD: 53.45%
• 6M: 14.36%
• 1Y: -12.67%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: -12.02%
• 10Y*: -10.80%

SVM

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -20.96%
• YTD: 27.95%
• 6M: 36.46%
• 1Y: 156.34%
• 3Y*: 52.84%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: 18.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARA vs. SVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc.	53.45%	-46.45%	-28.61%	586.84%	-89.59%	214.75%	1,084.48%	-39.16%	-91.17%	-40.41%
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc.	27.95%	179.29%	14.88%	-10.33%	-20.60%	-43.52%	18.54%	172.27%	-18.96%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MARA and SVM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2012	0.12

The correlation between MARA and SVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MARA : $5.24B SVM : $2.35B
EPS MARA : -$4.95 SVM : -$0.05
PS Ratio MARA : 6.54 SVM : 5.35
Total Revenue (TTM) MARA : $867.82M SVM : $437.11M
Gross Profit (TTM) MARA : $164.95M SVM : $254.02M
EBITDA (TTM) MARA : $373.68M SVM : $185.32M

Return for Risk

MARA vs. SVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARA

MARA Risk / Return Rank: 37
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 37

SVM

SVM Risk / Return Rank: 88
SVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SVM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SVM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARA vs. SVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MARA	SVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	2.31	-2.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	2.52	-2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.33	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	4.57	-4.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.30	12.47	-12.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MARA vs. SVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARA Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the SVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARA and SVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MARA	SVM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16	2.31	-2.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	0.22	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.08	0.30	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.17	-0.26

Drawdowns

MARA vs. SVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SVM drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARA and SVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARA	SVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.74%	-98.00%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.53%	-34.46%	-36.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.34%	-42.86%	-35.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.87%	-68.10%	-27.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.20%	-76.19%	-23.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.09%	-46.09%	-45.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.01%	-71.67%	-6.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.27%	12.59%	+29.68%

Volatility

MARA vs. SVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) is 22.21%, while Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a volatility of 25.49%. This indicates that MARA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARA	SVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.21%	25.49%	-3.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.03%	55.03%	+5.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.82%	68.20%	+10.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	106.02%	55.30%	+50.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.17%	61.63%	+82.54%

Dividends

MARA vs. SVM - Dividend Comparison

MARA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc.	0.23%	0.30%	0.83%	0.95%	0.84%	0.66%	0.37%	0.44%	1.19%	0.76%	0.43%	2.13%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARA and SVM in my portfolio?

MARA and SVM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MARA or SVM?

SVM has higher volatility (25.49%) compared to MARA (22.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARA dropped -99.74% vs SVM's -98.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.