MAR vs. ZTS
MAR (Marriott International, Inc.) and ZTS (Zoetis Inc.) are both stocks. MAR operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical), while ZTS operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, MAR returned 20.49%/yr vs 6.09%/yr for ZTS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAR vs. ZTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 26.66% return, which is significantly higher than ZTS's -36.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MAR has outperformed ZTS with an annualized return of 20.49%, while ZTS has yielded a comparatively lower 6.09% annualized return.
MAR
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 11.05%
- YTD
- 26.66%
- 6M
- 36.53%
- 1Y
- 48.66%
- 3Y*
- 31.04%
- 5Y*
- 23.16%
- 10Y*
- 20.49%
ZTS
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -36.81%
- 6M
- -32.72%
- 1Y
- -52.96%
- 3Y*
- -20.57%
- 5Y*
- -14.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
MAR vs. ZTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 26.66% | 12.31% | 24.92% | 53.06% | -9.34% | 25.26% | -12.53% | 41.49% | -19.05% | 66.24% |
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | -36.81% | -21.75% | -16.63% | 35.91% | -39.51% | 48.26% | 25.76% | 55.71% | 19.45% | 35.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAR and ZTS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2013 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
MAR:
$12.66
ZTS:
$6.04
MAR:
30.92
ZTS:
13.04
MAR:
0.81
ZTS:
1.46
MAR:
3.68
ZTS:
3.63
MAR:
$21.73B
ZTS:
$9.51B
MAR:
$1.31B
ZTS:
$6.73B
MAR:
$3.81B
ZTS:
$3.95B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAR vs. ZTS — Risk / Return Rank
MAR
ZTS
MAR vs. ZTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAR | ZTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.65 | +0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | -0.96 | +4.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | -2.06 | +11.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAR | ZTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | -1.49 | +3.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | -0.49 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.23 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.31 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
MAR vs. ZTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.59%, which is greater than ZTS's maximum drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and ZTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAR | ZTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.59% | -68.48% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -55.35% | +42.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.50% | -61.77% | +31.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.50% | -68.48% | +37.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.26% | -68.48% | +7.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -66.52% | +66.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -14.79% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | 26.22% | -21.19% |
Volatility
MAR vs. ZTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) is 6.25%, while Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that MAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAR | ZTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 12.29% | -6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.86% | 31.20% | -11.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.15% | 35.61% | -9.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.82% | 28.74% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.89% | 27.08% | +5.81% |
Dividends
MAR vs. ZTS - Dividend Comparison
MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than ZTS's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 0.87% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.95% | 1.39% | 1.42% |
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 0.76% | 0.89% | 0.41% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 0.58% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Financials
MAR vs. ZTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Zoetis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MAR and ZTS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZTS has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to MAR (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAR dropped -75.59% vs ZTS's -68.48%.
MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAR and ZTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer