PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAIN vs. NMFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAIN vs. NMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MAIN having a -12.08% return and NMFC slightly higher at -11.79%. Over the past 10 years, MAIN has outperformed NMFC with an annualized return of 12.99%, while NMFC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.08% annualized return.


MAIN

1D
-0.35%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-12.08%
6M
-13.81%
1Y
-3.91%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
12.99%

NMFC

1D
-0.51%
1M
-5.92%
YTD
-11.79%
6M
-13.53%
1Y
-16.84%
3Y*
-3.49%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
6.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAIN vs. NMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
-12.08%10.74%47.30%28.22%-11.37%48.31%-19.54%36.88%-8.27%16.62%
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
-11.79%-7.17%-0.95%15.47%-0.55%31.94%-7.13%20.64%2.78%5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MAIN and NMFC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2011

0.53

The correlation between MAIN and NMFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MAIN:

$5.22

NMFC:

$328.53

PE Ratio

MAIN:

9.85

NMFC:

0.02

PS Ratio

MAIN:

6.55

NMFC:

2.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAIN:

$704.17M

NMFC:

$315.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAIN:

$499.08M

NMFC:

$203.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

MAIN:

$396.90M

NMFC:

$106.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAIN vs. NMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAIN
MAIN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MAIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MAIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAIN Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

NMFC
NMFC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAIN vs. NMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAINNMFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.89

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.69

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

-1.35

+0.99

MAIN vs. NMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is higher than the NMFC Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAIN and NMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAINNMFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

-0.75

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

-0.00

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.24

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.31

+0.25

Drawdowns

MAIN vs. NMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAIN drawdown since its inception was -64.53%, roughly equal to the maximum NMFC drawdown of -64.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAIN and NMFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAINNMFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.53%

-64.16%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.43%

-24.56%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-27.77%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-27.77%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.53%

-64.16%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.30%

-23.29%

+3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.30%

-5.45%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.92%

12.48%

-1.56%

Volatility

MAIN vs. NMFC - Volatility Comparison

Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) has a higher volatility of 8.66% compared to New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) at 6.73%. This indicates that MAIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAINNMFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.66%

6.73%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.34%

18.23%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.94%

22.67%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

18.54%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

25.91%

+1.40%

Dividends

MAIN vs. NMFC - Dividend Comparison

MAIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, less than NMFC's 16.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
8.35%7.00%7.02%8.55%7.97%5.74%6.99%6.76%8.43%7.49%7.42%9.15%
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
16.43%13.90%12.17%11.40%9.86%8.76%10.92%9.90%10.81%10.04%9.65%10.45%

Financials

MAIN vs. NMFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Main Street Capital Corporation and New Mountain Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
140.11M
68.79M
(MAIN) Total Revenue
(NMFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MAIN and NMFC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAIN has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to NMFC (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAIN dropped -64.53% vs NMFC's -64.16%.

MAIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAIN and NMFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer