PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MA vs. RSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MA vs. RSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Republic Services, Inc. (RSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -14.65% return, which is significantly lower than RSG's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MA has outperformed RSG with an annualized return of 18.40%, while RSG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.16% annualized return.


MA

1D
-1.10%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
-14.65%
6M
-9.84%
1Y
-17.21%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
18.40%

RSG

1D
-2.43%
1M
2.45%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
-18.10%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
17.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MA vs. RSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-14.65%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
-2.74%6.44%23.03%29.64%-6.16%47.03%9.53%26.62%8.85%20.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MA and RSG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2006

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between MA and RSG has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MA:

$433.70B

RSG:

$63.34B

EPS

MA:

$17.28

RSG:

$6.98

PE Ratio

MA:

28.11

RSG:

29.36

PEG Ratio

MA:

1.64

RSG:

2.07

PS Ratio

MA:

12.90

RSG:

3.82

PB Ratio

MA:

64.52

RSG:

5.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

MA:

$33.94B

RSG:

$16.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MA:

$26.70B

RSG:

$3.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

MA:

$21.23B

RSG:

$4.89B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MA vs. RSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

RSG
RSG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
RSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA vs. RSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Republic Services, Inc. (RSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.85

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.88

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.68

-1.47

-0.21

MA vs. RSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MA Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is comparable to the RSG Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MA and RSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

-0.99

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.83

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.90

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.39

+0.44

Drawdowns

MA vs. RSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, smaller than the maximum RSG drawdown of -65.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and RSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-65.99%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-20.63%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-22.54%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.25%

-22.54%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

-34.02%

-6.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.55%

-19.72%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-11.83%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.26%

12.70%

-2.44%

Volatility

MA vs. RSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is 6.33%, while Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that MA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

6.85%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

13.54%

+3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

18.39%

+3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

18.11%

+5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.93%

19.06%

+7.87%

Dividends

MA vs. RSG - Dividend Comparison

MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than RSG's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.67%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
1.20%1.12%0.82%1.25%1.48%1.27%1.72%1.74%2.00%1.97%2.17%2.64%

Financials

MA vs. RSG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mastercard Incorporated and Republic Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
8.40B
4.11B
(MA) Total Revenue
(RSG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MA vs. RSG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mastercard Incorporated and Republic Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
58.4%
0
Portfolio components
MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

RSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

RSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.

RSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MA and RSG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSG has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to MA (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs RSG's -65.99%.

MA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MA and RSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer