MA vs. INVA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MA (Mastercard Incorporated) and INVA (Innoviva, Inc.) are both stocks. MA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while INVA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, MA returned 18.40%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for INVA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MA vs. INVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -14.65% return, which is significantly lower than INVA's 11.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MA has outperformed INVA with an annualized return of 18.40%, while INVA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.00% annualized return.

MA

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -1.98%
• YTD: -14.65%
• 6M: -9.84%
• 1Y: -17.21%
• 3Y*: 10.21%
• 5Y*: 6.59%
• 10Y*: 18.40%

INVA

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: 11.71%
• 6M: 6.33%
• 1Y: 3.48%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 12.47%
• 10Y*: 7.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MA vs. INVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MA Mastercard Incorporated	-14.65%	9.04%	24.17%	23.40%	-2.66%	1.16%	20.19%	59.16%	25.31%	47.69%
INVA Innoviva, Inc.	11.71%	15.22%	8.17%	21.06%	-23.19%	39.23%	-12.50%	-18.85%	22.97%	32.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MA and INVA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2006	0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between MA and INVA has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MA : $433.70B INVA : $1.89B
EPS MA : $17.28 INVA : $5.94
PE Ratio MA : 28.11 INVA : 3.76
PEG Ratio MA : 1.64 INVA : 0.02
PS Ratio MA : 12.90 INVA : 4.47
PB Ratio MA : 64.52 INVA : 1.31
Total Revenue (TTM) MA : $33.94B INVA : $424.12M
Gross Profit (TTM) MA : $26.70B INVA : $323.16M
EBITDA (TTM) MA : $21.23B INVA : $438.91M

Return for Risk

MA vs. INVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA

MA Risk / Return Rank: 9
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

INVA

INVA Risk / Return Rank: 44
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 40
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA vs. INVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MA	INVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	0.12	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.97	0.44	-1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.05	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	0.15	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.68	0.34	-2.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MA vs. INVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MA Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the INVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MA and INVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MA	INVA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78	0.12	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.46	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.21	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.05	+0.78

Drawdowns

MA vs. INVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, smaller than the maximum INVA drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and INVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MA	INVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.67%	-84.32%	+21.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.91%	-23.53%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.91%	-23.53%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.25%	-47.01%	+18.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.00%	-59.57%	+18.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.55%	-30.17%	+11.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.82%	-44.65%	+34.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.26%	10.21%	+0.05%

Volatility

MA vs. INVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is 6.33%, while Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that MA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MA	INVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	7.62%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.37%	16.91%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.28%	28.81%	-6.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.99%	27.28%	-3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.93%	33.89%	-6.96%

Dividends

MA vs. INVA - Dividend Comparison

MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while INVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INVA Innoviva, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.12%
MA Mastercard Incorporated	0.67%	0.53%	0.50%	0.53%	0.56%	0.49%	0.45%	0.44%	0.53%	0.58%	0.74%	0.66%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MA and INVA in my portfolio?

MA and INVA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MA or INVA?

INVA has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to MA (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs INVA's -84.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.