MA vs. FIVA
MA (Mastercard Incorporated) is a stock, while FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index. Over the past 5 years, MA returned 6.59%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for FIVA. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MA vs. FIVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -14.65% return, which is significantly lower than FIVA's 11.65% return.
MA
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -14.65%
- 6M
- -9.84%
- 1Y
- -17.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
FIVA
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 6M
- 16.62%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- —
MA vs. FIVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Incorporated | -14.65% | 9.04% | 24.17% | 23.40% | -2.66% | 1.16% | 20.19% | 59.16% | 15.25% |
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 11.65% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | -1.78% | 19.78% | -18.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MA and FIVA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MA and FIVA has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MA vs. FIVA — Risk / Return Rank
MA
FIVA
MA vs. FIVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MA | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.38 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 2.89 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | 11.27 | -12.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MA | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 2.18 | -2.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.75 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.48 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
MA vs. FIVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than FIVA's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and FIVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MA | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.67% | -39.76% | -22.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.91% | -11.71% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -14.77% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.25% | -28.70% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.55% | -1.89% | -16.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.82% | -7.77% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.26% | 3.00% | +7.26% |
Volatility
MA vs. FIVA - Volatility Comparison
Mastercard Incorporated (MA) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) at 4.87%. This indicates that MA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MA | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 4.87% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 12.80% | +4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.28% | 15.51% | +6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 16.39% | +7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 17.92% | +9.01% |
Dividends
MA vs. FIVA - Dividend Comparison
MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than FIVA's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.55% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MA Mastercard Incorporated | 0.67% | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MA and FIVA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MA has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to FIVA (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs FIVA's -39.76%.
FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MA and FIVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer