PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZEMX vs. DODGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZEMX vs. DODGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) and Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I (DODGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZEMX achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly higher than DODGX's 3.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LZEMX has underperformed DODGX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while DODGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.


LZEMX

1D
-2.93%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
21.36%
6M
23.16%
1Y
48.08%
3Y*
26.83%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
10.39%

DODGX

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.89%
YTD
3.91%
6M
6.39%
1Y
12.33%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZEMX vs. DODGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
21.36%41.35%7.60%22.44%-14.86%5.37%-0.07%18.06%-18.11%28.02%
DODGX
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I
3.91%13.66%14.36%17.49%-7.25%31.72%7.10%24.30%-7.15%18.33%

Correlation

The correlation between LZEMX and DODGX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1994

0.59

The correlation between LZEMX and DODGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZEMX vs. DODGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZEMX
LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DODGX
DODGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DODGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DODGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DODGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DODGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DODGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZEMX vs. DODGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) and Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I (DODGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LZEMXDODGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.21

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

1.82

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.23

6.39

+10.84

LZEMX vs. DODGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the DODGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZEMX and DODGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LZEMXDODGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56

1.21

+2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.54

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.66

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.63

-0.22

Drawdowns

LZEMX vs. DODGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZEMX drawdown since its inception was -60.08%, roughly equal to the maximum DODGX drawdown of -63.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZEMX and DODGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZEMXDODGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.08%

-63.24%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-7.48%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-14.89%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.49%

-21.85%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-40.41%

-3.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.41%

-0.70%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.63%

-7.51%

-9.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.12%

+0.72%

Volatility

LZEMX vs. DODGX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I (DODGX) at 2.97%. This indicates that LZEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DODGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZEMXDODGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

2.97%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

8.21%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

11.24%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

15.97%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

19.22%

-2.80%

LZEMX vs. DODGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZEMX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than DODGX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZEMX vs. DODGX - Dividend Comparison

LZEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than DODGX's 9.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DODGX
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I
9.36%9.86%8.20%3.76%5.47%3.22%6.74%10.23%9.69%6.78%6.26%5.36%
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
1.69%2.05%3.11%3.76%5.92%4.89%2.11%2.45%2.10%1.99%1.48%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


LZEMX and DODGX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZEMX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to DODGX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZEMX dropped -60.08% vs DODGX's -63.24%.

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZEMX and DODGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer