LYPG.DE vs. NASL.L
LYPG.DE (Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and NASL.L (Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - LYPG.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology, while NASL.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE returned 23.74%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for NASL.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
LYPG.DE vs. NASL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYPG.DE is traded in EUR, while NASL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NASL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a 25.00% return, which is significantly higher than NASL.L's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE has outperformed NASL.L with an annualized return of 23.74%, while NASL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 18.28% annualized return.
LYPG.DE
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 25.00%
- 6M
- 22.07%
- 1Y
- 47.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.91%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 23.74%
NASL.L
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 16.61%
- 1Y
- 34.83%
- 3Y*
- 24.43%
- 5Y*
- 18.29%
- 10Y*
- 18.28%
LYPG.DE vs. NASL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYPG.DE Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 25.00% | 9.20% | 41.03% | 49.19% | -28.32% | 41.72% | 30.66% | 51.20% | 0.61% | 20.65% |
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 18.71% | 5.89% | 34.99% | 51.08% | -29.23% | 38.22% | 35.64% | 27.63% | 3.26% | 11.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYPG.DE and NASL.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.74 |
The correlation between LYPG.DE and NASL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYPG.DE vs. NASL.L — Risk / Return Rank
LYPG.DE
NASL.L
LYPG.DE vs. NASL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYPG.DE | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.44 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 10.30 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYPG.DE | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.25 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.85 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | 0.84 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.63 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
LYPG.DE vs. NASL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum NASL.L drawdown of -55.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and NASL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYPG.DE | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -55.82% | +23.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.58% | -10.07% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.64% | -26.49% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -31.17% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.83% | -31.17% | -0.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -2.69% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -10.41% | +4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.91% | 3.37% | +2.54% |
Volatility
LYPG.DE vs. NASL.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) at 4.38%. This indicates that LYPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYPG.DE | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 4.38% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 10.78% | +4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 15.41% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 21.50% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 22.02% | -0.57% |
LYPG.DE vs. NASL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LYPG.DE and NASL.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
LYPG.DE vs. NASL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYPG.DE nor NASL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYPG.DE Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.61% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, LYPG.DE and NASL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYPG.DE and NASL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
LYPG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while NASL.L is Nasdaq-100. LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology, while NASL.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD.
Find the right allocation for LYPG.DE and NASL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer