LYPG.DE vs. ANXG.L
LYPG.DE (Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - LYPG.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology, while ANXG.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE returned 23.74%/yr vs 17.01%/yr for ANXG.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LYPG.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXG.L.
Performance
LYPG.DE vs. ANXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYPG.DE is traded in EUR, while ANXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ANXG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a 25.00% return, which is significantly higher than ANXG.L's 18.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE has outperformed ANXG.L with an annualized return of 23.74%, while ANXG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 17.01% annualized return.
LYPG.DE
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 25.00%
- 6M
- 22.07%
- 1Y
- 47.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.91%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 23.74%
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 18.53%
- 6M
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 34.66%
- 3Y*
- 24.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.30%
- 10Y*
- 17.01%
LYPG.DE vs. ANXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYPG.DE Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 25.00% | 9.20% | 41.03% | 49.19% | -28.32% | 41.72% | 30.66% | 51.20% | 0.61% | 20.65% |
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 18.53% | 5.87% | 34.91% | 51.14% | -29.26% | 38.29% | 35.58% | 42.74% | -22.98% | 27.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYPG.DE and ANXG.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.73 |
The correlation between LYPG.DE and ANXG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYPG.DE vs. ANXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LYPG.DE
ANXG.L
LYPG.DE vs. ANXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYPG.DE | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.41 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 10.17 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYPG.DE | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.22 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.92 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | 0.76 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.84 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
LYPG.DE vs. ANXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, roughly equal to the maximum ANXG.L drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and ANXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYPG.DE | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -32.74% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.58% | -10.13% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.64% | -26.49% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -31.37% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.83% | -32.74% | +0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -2.72% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -7.60% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.91% | 3.40% | +2.51% |
Volatility
LYPG.DE vs. ANXG.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) at 4.35%. This indicates that LYPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYPG.DE | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 4.35% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 10.94% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 15.54% | +4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 19.87% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 22.24% | -0.79% |
LYPG.DE vs. ANXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYPG.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXG.L's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYPG.DE vs. ANXG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYPG.DE nor ANXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, LYPG.DE and ANXG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPG.DE.
LYPG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while ANXG.L is Nasdaq-100. LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology, while ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPG.DE and 0.13% for ANXG.L.
Find the right allocation for LYPG.DE and ANXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer